The Comparator

Intel Core i5-14500 vs AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

Compare Intel Core i5-14500 and AMD Ryzen 7 8700F in the United States side by side across price, specifications, capability by use case and the price at which the answer changes.

Market snapshot Nov 9, 2026 · USD

Specifications, performance and current prices compared in United States · USD · prices checked through Nov 9, 2026

Open in Compare

Intel Core i5-14500

Intel

Current comparison price

$248Value · Balanced44

from 3 offers at 3 retailers · checked Nov 9

Capability highlights · price excluded

  • B Gaming
  • B Productivity
  • C Performance per Watt

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

AMD

Current comparison price

$240Value · Balanced45

from 4 offers at 4 retailers · checked Nov 9

Capability highlights · price excluded

  • A Performance per Watt
+2 more · view all grades
  • B Gaming
  • B Productivity
  • A Performance per Watt

Key differences at a glance

Capabilityprice excluded

Scenarios won: Intel Core i5-14500 0, AMD Ryzen 7 8700F 1, even 2. AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is ahead for Performance per Watt. View grades →

Valueunder Balanced

Practically even under these priorities (44 vs 45).

Pricecurrent market snapshot

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F costs less right now ($240 vs $248, 3% apart).

How priorities change the comparison Presets with the higher Value: Intel Core i5-14500 1 · AMD Ryzen 7 8700F 2 · even 1
Priority Intel Core i5-14500 AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
4445even
6368
5954
3448

Pick a preset to compare under it: the whole page follows. Within 2 points counts as even.

Price difference and break-even price

Under Balanced, each product holds or loses the higher Value at one price, with the other held at its current price. Enter the prices you were actually offered to see the answer for your deal.

Intel Core i5-14500

Current comparison price

$248 44

Intel Core i5-14500 matches the Value of AMD Ryzen 7 8700F (at $240) at $240 or less.

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

Current comparison price

$240 45

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F keeps the higher Value up to $248 (with Intel Core i5-14500 at $248).

A crossover is a calculation under the active priorities and today's market frame, not a price forecast.

Price comparison: current offers

New offers we track in United States (USD), cheapest first, with the date each was checked. Amazon appears as a link only: its price is not shown and never enters Value.

Intel Core i5-14500

  1. Check on AmazonBest priceIntel Core i5-14500Amazon · checked Go to offer →
  2. $248Intel Core i5-14500B&H · checked Go to offer →
  3. $271Intel Core i5-14500MemoryC · checked · Affiliate linkGo to offer →
  4. Currently unavailable · last seen
  5. $248Intel Core i5-14500 - Core i5 14th Gen Raptor Lake 14-Core (6P+8E) LGA 1700 65W Intel UHD Graphics 770 Processor - BX8071514500Newegg · last seen · no longer in the retailer’s listing · Affiliate linkView listing

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

  1. Check on AmazonBest priceAMD Ryzen 7 8700FAmazon · checked Go to offer →
  2. $240AMD Ryzen 7 8700FB&H · checked Go to offer →
  3. $295AMD Ryzen 7 8700FNewegg · checked · Affiliate linkGo to offer →
  4. $315AMD Ryzen 7 8700FMemoryC · checked · Affiliate linkGo to offer →

Affiliate links may earn us a commission. They never change the prices shown here, the ranking or Value.

Performance and key differences

What each product can do for a job, graded S to F with price left out, and the measured indexes behind it.

View full tier list and performance rankings

Intel Core i5-14500 AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
GamingB #84B #81
ProductivityB #88B #87
Performance per WattC #90A #12
Multi-core performance870871
Single-core performance843887
Gaming performance937944

Where each one leads

  • Higher cores
  • Lower current price · Higher Value with these priorities · Lower TDP · More offers

Specifications compared

Facts true of every board a product groups; a range or "varies" marks a fact that differs between boards.

4 identical facts hidden

Intel Core i5-14500 AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
Cores and cache
Cores14 cores8 cores
Threads20 threads16 threads
L3 cache24 MB16 MB
Platform
SocketLGA 1700AM5
Memory supportDDR5, DDR4DDR5
Integrated graphicsYesNo
Unlocked multiplierNoYes
Power and process
TDP154 W88 W
Process node10 nm4 nm
Product
ManufacturerIntelAMD
ArchitectureRaptor Cove / GracemontPhoenix

Not tracked means the source data does not have this fact. It is not assumed to be absent.

Which one to choose: where each wins

Conditions drawn from the data above, not a universal recommendation. The better choice depends on which of these matter to you.

Intel Core i5-14500 fits better when…

  • Cores matters: 14 cores vs 8 cores
  • L3 cache matters: 24 MB vs 16 MB

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F fits better when…

  • the job is Performance per Watt: higher capability grade
  • Single-core performance matters: higher index
  • your priorities are Balanced: higher Value
  • the budget decides: 3% lower current price
  • lower TDP matters: 88 W vs 154 W

Nearby market alternative

Worth considering instead
Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus — same A-tier capability for Gaming, about $45 cheaper · Value 88.
Neither of the two above is the only answer — this one clears the same bar for less. ⇄ Compare all three

Questions and methodology

Which one is better, Intel Core i5-14500 or AMD Ryzen 7 8700F?

It depends on the question. For capability (price left out) see the grades by use case; for how good the current price is for what you get, see Value under your priorities; and for the cheapest option today, see current prices. This page keeps the three apart and does not name one overall winner.

Which has the higher Value right now?

Under Balanced they are practically even (44 vs 45) in the market snapshot of Nov 9, 2026. Value changes with your priorities and with prices.

Which one is more capable, ignoring price?

Scenarios won: Intel Core i5-14500 0, AMD Ryzen 7 8700F 1, even 2. AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is ahead for Performance per Watt.

Where can I compare current offers?

The offers section lists every new offer we track for both products in United States, with the date each price was checked. Open in Compare to add more products.

How we measure →