TC
The Comparator

Crucial BX500 4TB vs Samsung 870 QVO 4TB — value comparison

Crucial BX500 4TB and Samsung 870 QVO 4TB are practically even under balanced weights at the current dataset offers: 15 vs 13. Change the preset or your priorities before deciding.
Price data · US · USD · New · A 2026-09-11 · B 2026-09-11Coverage · 5 tracked new-offer records across both modelsBenchmark confidence · no estimate flags on these two recordsAffiliate links · We may earn a commission from these links. Scores are calculated separately using our methodology.
02 · Decision matrix

One decision, three separate questions

Capability ignores price. Relative Value adds the current dataset offers and your priorities. Keeping them separate prevents a cheap product from being mistaken for the faster product.

Same scenario engine as the tier lists · offer frame 2026-09-11
The decision, split by questioncapability · value · price are separate answers
CapabilityEven across scenarios
Better value todayCrucial BX500 4TB — 2 more Value points under this configuration
Cheaper right nowCrucial BX500 4TB (by $110)

Capability by task

Capability by task: Crucial BX500 4TB versus Samsung 870 QVO 4TB
ScenarioCrucial BX500 4TBSamsung 870 QVO 4TB
System DriveA#216A#253
Game & File StorageS#18S#38
Heavy Creative WorkB#247B#253

They grade identically in all 3 graded scenarios — the tier table won't decide this one, so compare price and Value below. These are the same S–F grades as the tier list — capability only, price excluded. The value rows below add prices from the 2026-09-11 offer frame. How tiers are assigned →

Relative Value by priority

Balancedpractically even (≤3 pts)
15
13
System Drivepractically even (≤3 pts)
0
0
Game & File Storagehigher relative value lit
64 ✓
55
Heavy Creative Workpractically even (≤3 pts)
0
0
Strict Budgethigher relative value lit
27 ✓
22

Both products are normalized within the same in-stock market frame per preset. A check marks the higher Relative Value; a difference of 3 points or less is shown as practically even.

03 · Price crossover

The price changes the answer

Current offers, crossover points and Strong Value thresholds answer different questions. Thresholds are calculations, not price forecasts.

Balanced preset · rival offer held fixed

A · Crucial BX500 4TB

Current dataset offer · NewUS · USD · snapshot 2026-09-11
$490
Beats Samsung 870 QVO 4TB atbalanced weights; rival offer held fixed
$624
Strong Value at80+ Relative Value threshold
$46

B · Samsung 870 QVO 4TB

Current dataset offer · NewUS · USD · snapshot 2026-09-11
$600
Beats Crucial BX500 4TB atbalanced weights; rival offer held fixed
$471
Strong Value at80+ Relative Value threshold
$44
04 · Where to buy

Current offers for both products

Dated New-condition price snapshots for only the two products in this comparison. Confirm the final price and availability at the store.

US · USD · New · up to 4 per product
05 · Capability

Capability indexes, side by side

Price is intentionally excluded here so the more capable product and the better-value product cannot be confused.

A = violet · B = blue · labels and numbers preserve meaning without color
Drive capability 540
500
Sequential read (MB/s) 540
500
Sequential write (MB/s) 500
500
A · Crucial BX500 4TBB · Samsung 870 QVO 4TBEach row keeps the unit or category index named in its label; bar length compares A and B within that row.Crucial BX500 4TB shows higher Value under every weighting we test — a stable result in the 2026-09-11 offer frame.
06 · Platform & ownership

Fit, compatibility and ownership context

Only verified structured compatibility and ownership fields are shown. Check the exact system, board manual and vendor QVL before purchase; missing fields are never guessed.

A · Crucial BX500 4TB

  • InterfaceSATA 6.0 Gb/s
  • Form factor2.5"
  • Capacity4,000 GB
  • DRAM cacheDRAM-less
  • Heatsink includedNo
  • Write endurance1,440 TBW
  • Warranty (typical new)60 mo

B · Samsung 870 QVO 4TB

  • InterfaceSATA 6.0 Gb/s
  • Form factor2.5"
  • Capacity4,000 GB
  • DRAM cache4GB LPDDR4
  • Heatsink includedNo
  • Write endurance1,440 TBW
  • Warranty (typical new)60 mo
07 · Specifications

Key specifications

Directional checkmarks appear only on numeric fields where more or less has a clear meaning. They are not an overall verdict.

Up to 12 key rows · additional verified fields below
Key specifications: Crucial BX500 4TB versus Samsung 870 QVO 4TB
SpecificationCrucial BX500 4TBSamsung 870 QVO 4TB
InterfaceSATA 6.0 Gb/sSATA 6.0 Gb/s
Form factor2.5"2.5"
Capacity4,000 GB4,000 GB
Sequential read540 MB/s✓500 MB/s
Sequential write500 MB/s500 MB/s
Write endurance1,440 TBW1,440 TBW
DRAM cacheDRAM-less4GB LPDDR4
NAND typeMicron 3D QLC/TLCSamsung QLC V-NAND
ControllerSMI SM2258XTSamsung MKX
Heatsink includedNoNo
Current dataset offer · New$490snapshot 2026-09-11✓$600snapshot 2026-09-11
Warranty (typical new)60 mo60 mo

“Not tracked” means the source data does not contain a verified value; no default or guessed specification is substituted.

08 · Customize

Try other models and your own priorities

Presets are starting points. Swap either side, then open Advanced weights only if you want to tune the formula directly.

Runs locally in your browser · nothing is sent anywhere
09 · Alternative

A third option worth checking

The same scenario and market frame checks whether another currently priced model offers a cleaner trade-off.

Worth considering instead
Crucial T710 1TB — same S-tier capability for System Drive, about $280 cheaper · Value 100.
Neither of the two above is the only answer — this one clears the same bar for less. ⇄ Compare all three
10 · Decision guide

Choose based on the trade-off you actually want

These are evidence-linked conditions, not universal buying verdicts. Feature ecosystems, software support and platform preferences remain your call.

Choose A · Crucial BX500 4TB if…

  • Your priorities resemble Game & File Storage, Strict Budget — it has higher Relative Value under those presets at the snapshot offers.
  • You can find it at or below its Strong Value threshold of $46 under balanced weights.
Full Crucial BX500 4TB analysis →
Compare — add more models →Open in the calculator →
11 · Methodology & FAQ

How to read this comparison

The formula is a linear weighted sum inside the current comparison frame. Capability, price and user priorities stay visible as separate inputs so the result can be challenged and changed.

Read the methodology →
Which is better value right now: Crucial BX500 4TB or Samsung 870 QVO 4TB?
Under the balanced preset and the 2026-09-11 offer frame, they are practically even in Relative Value (15 vs 13). Change the preset or weights to reflect your own priorities; capability is a separate question, answered by the tier table.
Which one is more capable, ignoring price?
They grade identically in all 3 graded scenarios — the tier table won't decide this one, so compare price and Value below.
Where can I compare current offers for both?
Dated offer snapshots for both models are listed on their product pages (linked above); the interactive calculator recalculates both with your own weights and budget.
Get more from The Comparator
🧩 Embed this on your siteFree live value widgets — drop a deal monitor or comparison into your blog or article. 🔎 Price a used listingPaste any marketplace listing and score it against today's market in the calculator. ✏️ Found a data error?Tell us — we keep prices and specs honest, dated and corrected fast.

Offer frame: 2026-09-11 · dataset generated 2026-09-11 · formula ssd-value-v1.5-benefit-cost-product · Value Score is an estimate based on our current dataset, selected weights, market prices and methodology — not an official product rating or a price forecast. Target prices are calculation thresholds, not predictions. Methodology · Report a data error