RX 9070
The current RX 9070 price from retailers, its key specifications, and how it performs for each job.
AMD · GPU · RX 9000
Retailer photo of ASRock RX 9070 Challenger. View this offer in Where to buy
Works well for: 1080p Gaming, 1440p Gaming, Ray Tracing @ 1080p
Trade-offs: Current price sits $147 above the strong-value threshold (~$603)
- VRAM
- 16 GB
- Memory bandwidth
- 643 GB/s
- Board power
- 220 W
- Architecture
- RDNA 4.0
- Interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Move a slider and the page re-scores this product against the same market frame.
What does it cost today, and is that a good price?
Market confidence: HighAt $750 the RX 9070 is priced 32% below its $1110 representative market level. Nothing in the current frame clears the same bar for less.
Price looks competitive: the cheapest verified offer is 32% below the current representative level.
Prices & availability
RX 9070: current price and offers
Compare the offers we track for this model, across variants and retailers.
15 tracked offers · 4 retailers
| Variant | Store | Condition | Price (snapshot) | Value · Balanced | Checked | Offer link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASRock RX 9070 Challenger | Newegg | New | $750 | 64 | 2026-11-07 | View offer → |
| ASUS PRIME RX 9070 OC | CentralComputer | New | $900 | 54 | 2026-11-09 | View offer → |
| GIGABYTE RX 9070 GAMING | Newegg | New | $935 | 52 | 2026-11-09 | View offer → |
| Gigabyte Radeon RX 9070 GAMING OC 16GB | Newegg | New | $972 | 50 | 2026-11-09 | View offer → |
| Sapphire PULSE RX 9070 | Newegg | New | $1,015 | 48 | 2026-11-09 | View offer → |
| RX 9070Multiple variants available | Amazon Affiliate | Varies | Find on Amazon | Not tracked | No price snapshot | Find on Amazon → |
Prices are dated snapshots, not live quotes — confirm the final price at the store. New, refurbished and used offers are listed separately; used offers carry warranty and seller risk.
Show the other 10 tracked offers
| Variant | Store | Condition | Price (snapshot) | Value · Balanced | Checked | Offer link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS PRIME RX 9070 OC | B&H | New | $1,020 | 47 | 2026-11-09 | View offer → |
| ASUS PRIME RX 9070 OC | Newegg | New | $1,020 | 47 | 2026-11-09 | View offer → |
| Sapphire NITRO+ RX 9070 | Newegg | New | $1,110 | 43 | 2026-11-08 | View offer → |
| PowerColor Reaper RX 9070 | MemoryC | New | $1,129 | 43 | 2026-11-07 | View offer → |
| XFX Swift RX 9070 OC Triple Fan Edition | MemoryC | New | $1,192 | 40 | 2026-11-09 | View offer → |
| XFX Swift RX 9070 OC White Triple Fan Edition | MemoryC | New | $1,219 | 40 | 2026-11-09 | View offer → |
| Sapphire PURE RX 9070 | MemoryC | New | $1,229 | 39 | 2026-11-09 | View offer → |
| Sapphire NITRO+ RX 9070 | MemoryC | New | $1,274 | 38 | 2026-11-09 | View offer → |
| GIGABYTE RX 9070 GAMING OC | MemoryC | New | $1,324 | 36 | 2026-11-09 | View offer → |
| Sapphire PULSE RX 9070 | MemoryC | New | $1,336 | 36 | 2026-11-09 | View offer → |
Performance and where it ranks
Two different questions, side by side. Performance compares what the hardware can do; Value compares what that capability costs at today’s price. A product can rank high on one and low on the other — that gap is the point.
Performance Balanced
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#17 of 54 graded graphics cards
- #14 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 52
- #15 NVIDIARTX 5070 47
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 47
- #17 AMDRX 9070 46
- #18 NVIDIARTX 3090 45
- #19 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 45
- #20 NVIDIARTX 3080 10GB 42
Value Balanced
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#6 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #3 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 79
- #4 NVIDIARTX 5060 67
- #5 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 66
- #6 AMDRX 9070 64
- #7 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 63
- #8 AMDRX 9070 GRE 59
- #9 AMDRX 9070 XT 59
Performance 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#17 of 54 graded graphics cards
- #14 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 52
- #15 NVIDIARTX 5070 47
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 47
- #17 AMDRX 9070 46
- #18 NVIDIARTX 3090 45
- #19 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 45
- #20 NVIDIARTX 3080 10GB 42
Value 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#6 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #3 IntelArc B580 83
- #4 NVIDIARTX 5060 70
- #5 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 69
- #6 AMDRX 9070 65
- #7 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 63
- #8 AMDRX 9070 GRE 61
- #9 AMDRX 9070 XT 60
Performance 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#17 of 54 graded graphics cards
- #14 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 52
- #15 NVIDIARTX 5070 47
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 47
- #17 AMDRX 9070 46
- #18 NVIDIARTX 3090 45
- #19 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 45
- #20 NVIDIARTX 3080 10GB 42
Value 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#6 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #3 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 77
- #4 NVIDIARTX 5060 67
- #5 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 66
- #6 AMDRX 9070 66
- #7 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 62
- #8 AMDRX 9070 XT 60
- #9 AMDRX 9070 GRE 59
Performance 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#17 of 54 graded graphics cards
- #14 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 52
- #15 NVIDIARTX 5070 47
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 47
- #17 AMDRX 9070 46
- #18 NVIDIARTX 3090 45
- #19 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 45
- #20 NVIDIARTX 3080 10GB 42
Value 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#2 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #1 AMDRX 9070 XT 100
- #2 AMDRX 9070 98
- #3 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 87
- #4 IntelArc B580 86
- #5 NVIDIARTX 5070 85
- #6 AMDRX 9070 GRE 84
- #7 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 84
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#12 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #9 AMDRX 9070 XT 62
- #10 NVIDIARTX 5070 59
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 58
- #12 AMDRX 9070 54
- #13 NVIDIARTX 3090 53
- #14 NVIDIARTX 4070 51
- #15 AMDRX 7900 XT 49
Value Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#2 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #1 AMDRX 9070 XT 100
- #2 AMDRX 9070 98
- #3 NVIDIARTX 5070 88
- #4 IntelArc B580 86
- #5 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 84
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 83
- #7 AMDRX 9070 GRE 82
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#11 of 41 graded graphics cards
- #8 AMDRX 9070 XT 55
- #9 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 55
- #10 NVIDIARTX 5070 51
- #11 AMDRX 9070 47
- #12 NVIDIARTX 3090 47
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 43
- #14 AMDRX 7900 XT 43
Value Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#2 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #1 AMDRX 9070 XT 100
- #2 AMDRX 9070 97
- #3 NVIDIARTX 5070 86
- #4 IntelArc B580 84
- #5 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 84
- #6 AMDRX 9070 GRE 80
- #7 NVIDIARTX 5080 79
Performance Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#10 of 42 graded graphics cards
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 50
- #8 AMDRX 9070 XT 47
- #9 NVIDIARTX 3090 41
- #10 AMDRX 9070 40
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 37
- #12 AMDRX 7900 XT 36
- #13 NVIDIARTX 5070 35
Value Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#3 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #1 NVIDIARTX 5090 100
- #2 AMDRX 9070 XT 90
- #3 AMDRX 9070 84
- #4 NVIDIARTX 5080 84
- #5 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 82
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5070 76
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 74
Performance AI
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#22 of 52 graded graphics cards
- #19 AMDRadeon AI Pro R9700 22
- #20 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 20
- #21 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 20
- #22 AMDRX 9070 16
- #23 AMDRX 9070 GRE 16
- #24 NVIDIARTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16
- #25 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 15
Value AI
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#7 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #4 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 87
- #5 NVIDIARTX 5070 87
- #6 AMDRX 9070 XT 87
- #7 AMDRX 9070 83
- #8 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 82
- #9 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 82
- #10 NVIDIARTX 4070 80
Performance 3D Rendering
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#24 of 41 graded graphics cards
- #21 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 23
- #22 NVIDIARTX 4060 23
- #23 AMDRX 9070 XT 22
- #24 AMDRX 9070 19
- #25 NVIDIARTX 5050 19
- #26 AMDRX 7900 GRE 19
- #27 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 18
Value 3D Rendering
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#10 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 85
- #8 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 83
- #9 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 83
- #10 AMDRX 9070 82
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4070 81
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4080 79
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4090 78
Performance Light Use
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#29 of 52 graded graphics cards
- #26 NVIDIARTX 4070 66
- #27 AMDRX 9070 GRE 62
- #28 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 61
- #29 AMDRX 9070 61
- #30 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 61
- #31 IntelArc A750 60
- #32 IntelArc A770 60
Value Light Use
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#22 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #19 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 12
- #20 AMDRX 9070 GRE 12
- #21 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 12
- #22 AMDRX 9070 11
- #23 AMDRX 6600 XT 11
- #24 NVIDIARTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 10
- #25 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 10
These ladders follow the preset scenario shown above. Your own weights re-score this product, not the whole field.
What it is good for
| Scenario | this productCapability grade · Value at current price | Higher capability | Higher Value with current priorities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced (all-round)Weighted all-round view | GradeNo grade Value64 | — | — |
| 1080p GamingRaster performance · 1080p | GradeS Value65 | — | — |
| 1440p GamingRaster performance · 1440p | GradeA Value66 | — | — |
| 4K / VRRaster performance · 4K / VR | GradeB Value98 | — | — |
| Ray Tracing @ 1080pRay tracing capability · 1080p | GradeA Value98 | — | — |
| Ray Tracing @ 1440pRay tracing capability · 1440p | GradeB Value97 | — | — |
| Ray Tracing @ 4KRay tracing capability · 4K | GradeD Value84 | — | — |
| AI / Local LLMAI compute · memory and ecosystem fit | GradeB Value83 | Higher capability RTX 3080 10GB C 71 +65% capability · -1% price | — |
| 3D Rendering3D rendering · creator workloads | GradeC Value82 | Higher capability RTX 4070 A 81 +110% capability · +20% price | — |
| Light Use & EfficiencyEfficiency · lighter workloads | GradeC Value11 | Higher capability RX 6400 S 63 +64% capability · -60% price | Higher Value with current priorities Arc A380 S 100 +56% capability · -75% price |
Balanced has no letter: it is a weighting preset, not a capability rubric. A grade answers “how well does this handle that job?” — price is never part of it. Relative Value puts the current market price back in.
Compare these grades with the full tier list
Browse shortlists for different uses
Trade-offs
Works well if
- 1080p Gaming is your main prioritygraded S for 1080p Gaming on the same rubric as the tier list
- Strong-value threshold: ~$603$603 is where Relative Value reaches 80 with Balanced priorities, in the 2026-11-02–2026-11-09 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
Consider other options if
- Current price sits $147 above the strong-value threshold (~$603)cheapest tracked $750 against a $603 calculated threshold with Balanced priorities
- Not the pick if 3D Rendering is your main useit grades only C there
Works well if
- 1080p is your main priority — S here means 144 Hz+ ultra with headroomgraded S for 1080p on the same rubric as the tier list
- Strong-value threshold: ~$610$610 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for 1080p, in the 2026-11-02–2026-11-09 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — 16 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 8 GB grades A for 1080p; this one has 16 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Current price sits $140 above the strong-value threshold (~$610)cheapest tracked $750 against a $610 calculated threshold for 1080p
- Not the pick if 3D Rendering is your main useit grades only C there
Works well if
- 1440p is your main priority — A here means confident 90–130 fps at high settings, 12 GB+ VRAMgraded A for 1440p on the same rubric as the tier list
- Strong-value threshold: ~$614$614 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for 1440p, in the 2026-11-02–2026-11-09 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — 16 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 10 GB grades B for 1440p; this one has 16 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Current price sits $136 above the strong-value threshold (~$614)cheapest tracked $750 against a $614 calculated threshold for 1440p
- Not the pick if 3D Rendering is your main useit grades only C there
Works well if
- 4K is your main priority — B here means around 60 fps at 4K high; upscaling keeps it theregraded B for 4K on the same rubric as the tier list
- Today's price already clears the strong-value markcheapest tracked $750 against a $1123 threshold for 4K
- You want memory headroom — 16 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 10 GB grades C for 4K; this one has 16 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 3D Rendering is your main useit grades only C there
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1080p is your main priority — A here means solid — a good base for upscalinggraded A for Ray Tracing @ 1080p on the same rubric as the tier list, from 68 fps measured natively (upscaling typically adds 40–60% on top)
- Today's price already clears the strong-value markcheapest tracked $750 against a $1117 threshold for Ray Tracing @ 1080p
- You want memory headroom — 16 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 6 GB grades C for Ray Tracing @ 1080p; this one has 16 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 3D Rendering is your main useit grades only C there
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1440p is your main priority — B here means solid — a good base for upscalinggraded B for Ray Tracing @ 1440p on the same rubric as the tier list, from 48 fps measured natively (upscaling typically adds 40–60% on top)
- Today's price already clears the strong-value markcheapest tracked $750 against a $1099 threshold for Ray Tracing @ 1440p
- You want memory headroom — 16 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 6 GB grades C for Ray Tracing @ 1440p; this one has 16 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 3D Rendering is your main useit grades only C there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 4K is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades D for Ray Tracing @ 4K, but S for 1080p Gaming
- Today's price already clears the strong-value markcheapest tracked $750 against a $918 threshold for Ray Tracing @ 4K
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 4K is your main useit grades only D there
Works well if
- AI is your main prioritygraded B for AI on the same rubric as the tier list
- Today's price already clears the strong-value markcheapest tracked $750 against a $804 threshold for AI
- You want memory headroom — 16 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 10 GB grades C for AI; this one has 16 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 3D Rendering is your main useit grades only C there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 3D Rendering is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for 3D Rendering, but S for 1080p Gaming
- Today's price already clears the strong-value markcheapest tracked $750 against a $795 threshold for 3D Rendering
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 3D Rendering is your main useit grades C there; RTX 4070 grades A at $897
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRTX 5060 holds Relative Value 59 against its 82 for 3D Rendering, at $460
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Light Use is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for Light Use, but S for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Light Use is your main useit grades C there; RX 6400 grades S at $303
- You want strong value for Light Use specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for Light Use — the calculation only gets there near $205, against a cheapest tracked $750
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelArc A380 holds Relative Value 100 against its 11 for Light Use, at $190
Every line states the fact it was derived from, for the scenario selected above. Thresholds are calculated points on our value curve — information about where the maths turns, not instructions about what to pay.
Similar options to the RX 9070
Chosen for Balanced
Chosen for 1080p
Chosen for 1440p
Chosen for 4K
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1080p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1440p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 4K
Chosen for AI
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: CUDA — Many local-LLM and diffusion toolchains are CUDA-only. ROCm and Vulkan builds exist and work, but they are not drop-in — check your toolchain before treating a non-NVIDIA card as an equivalent swap.
Chosen for 3D Rendering
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: OptiX — Blender Cycles reaches its fastest path on NVIDIA OptiX. HIP (AMD) and oneAPI (Intel) render the same scenes, so this is a workflow question, not a capability wall — but render times and add-on support differ.
Chosen for Light Use
Alternatives stay near this product’s price range. Step-up options may exceed the standard budget envelope when the capability gain is meaningful.
More head-to-head comparisons in this category
Upgrade planner
Judge the change in the active scenario, then make the cash gap explicit.
Using page scenarioWhat are you upgrading from? These are the axes we compare on, and where this product stands in the current market.
We rank upgrades by out-of-pocket cost — the new price minus what yours is worth — not by sticker price.
Only candidates that clear the configured meaningful-upgrade gate will be shown; roles are omitted rather than filled.
Capability differences are expressed as tiers and index points, not as benchmark percentages we did not measure.
Specifications and compatibility
What this product is, and what to check before it goes into your build.
Core / Performance
- Architecture
- RDNA 4.0
- GPU chip
- Navi 48
- GPU variant
- Navi 48 XT (215-176600331)
- Process node
- 4 nm
- Transistors
- 53,900 million
- Shading units
- 3584
Memory
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 220 W
- Power connector
- Varies by version
- Recommended PSU
- Varies by version
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Varies by version280–350 mm across tracked variants
- Height
- Varies by version111–150 mm across tracked variants
- Width
- Varies by version
- Slot thickness
- Varies by version2–3 across tracked variants
- Fans
- Varies by version2–3 across tracked variants
- Cooling
- Varies by version
- Outputs
- Varies by version
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 220 W
- Power connector
- 2x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 550 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 290 mm
- Height
- 123 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- RX9070 CL 16G
- Vendor warranty
- 2 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 220 W
- Power connector
- 2x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 550 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 312 mm
- Height
- 130 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- PRIME-RX9070-O16G
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 220 W
- Power connector
- 2x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 550 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 288 mm
- Height
- 132 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 2× DisplayPort · 2× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-R9070GAMING
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 220 W
- Power connector
- 2x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 550 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 288 mm
- Height
- 132 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 2× DisplayPort · 2× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-R9070GAMING OC
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 220 W
- Power connector
- 2x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 550 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 289 mm
- Height
- 111 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- RX9070 16G-A
- Vendor warranty
- 2 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 220 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 550 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 331 mm
- Height
- 129 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 2× DisplayPort · 2× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- 11349-01-20G
- Vendor warranty
- 2 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 220 W
- Power connector
- 2x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 550 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 280 mm
- Height
- 120 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 2× DisplayPort · 2× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- 11349-03-20G
- Vendor warranty
- 2 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 220 W
- Power connector
- 2x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 550 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 320 mm
- Height
- 120 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 2× DisplayPort · 2× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- 11349-02-20G
- Vendor warranty
- 2 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 220 W
- Power connector
- 3x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 550 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 350 mm
- Height
- 150 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- RX-97SWFB3B9
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 220 W
- Power connector
- 3x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 550 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 350 mm
- Height
- 150 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- RX-97SWFB3W9
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 220 W
- Power connector
- 2x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 550 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Unknown
- Height
- Unknown
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- Unknown
- Fans
- Unknown
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- Unknown
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-R9070GAMING-16GD
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Select an exact version for physical dimensions and connector details.
Show all specifications
Core / Performance
- Texture units
- 224
- ROPs
- 128
- Ray tracing cores
- 56
- Tensor cores
- 0
- Base clock
- 1330 MHz
- Boost clock
- 2520 MHz
Features
- Upscaling
- FSR 4
- Frame generation
- frame generation
- Ray tracing
- Supported
- RGB lighting
- No
Warranty & release
- Release year
- 2025
Hover any value to see where it came from: a manufacturer specification, or a figure The Comparator calculated.
Sources: Comparator offer frame 2026-11-02–2026-11-09
What to check in your build
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Select a board to confirm its connector and cable-clearance needs.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Slot occupancy depends on the board cooler and thickness.
Select an exact version above for physical dimensions and connector details.
550 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
2x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 290 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
550 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
2x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 312 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
550 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
2x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 288 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
550 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
2x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 288 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
550 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
2x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 289 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
550 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 331 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
550 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
2x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 280 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
550 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
2x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 320 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
550 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
3x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 350 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
550 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
3x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 350 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
550 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
2x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Unknown
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Unknown
Compare all 11 board variants
| Variant | Length | Slot thickness | Power connector | Recommended PSU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASRock RX 9070 Challenger | 290 mm | 2 | 2x 8-pin | 550 W |
| ASUS PRIME RX 9070 OC | 312 mm | 2 | 2x 8-pin | 550 W |
| GIGABYTE RX 9070 GAMING | 288 mm | 2 | 2x 8-pin | 550 W |
| GIGABYTE RX 9070 GAMING OC | 288 mm | 2 | 2x 8-pin | 550 W |
| PowerColor Reaper RX 9070 | 289 mm | 2 | 2x 8-pin | 550 W |
| Sapphire NITRO+ RX 9070 | 331 mm | 3 | 1x 16-pin | 550 W |
| Sapphire PULSE RX 9070 | 280 mm | 2 | 2x 8-pin | 550 W |
| Sapphire PURE RX 9070 | 320 mm | 3 | 2x 8-pin | 550 W |
| XFX Swift RX 9070 OC Triple Fan Edition | 350 mm | 3 | 3x 8-pin | 550 W |
| XFX Swift RX 9070 OC White Triple Fan Edition | 350 mm | 3 | 3x 8-pin | 550 W |
| Gigabyte Radeon RX 9070 GAMING OC 16GB | Unknown | Unknown | 2x 8-pin | 550 W |
Found an error? Report this specification Email the field, corrected value and an optional source.
Compatibility guidance is practical help, not a score. Missing data is shown as unknown, never invented.
Summary
RX 9070 offers a balanced view across an all-round mix of priorities. It ranks #17 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1180. The main limitation appears when 3D Rendering becomes the priority, where it grades C.
RX 9070 offers S-grade capability for 1080p. It ranks #17 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1180. The main limitation appears when 3D Rendering becomes the priority, where it grades C.
RX 9070 offers A-grade capability for 1440p. It ranks #17 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1180. The main limitation appears when 3D Rendering becomes the priority, where it grades C.
RX 9070 offers B-grade capability for 4K. It ranks #17 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1180. The main limitation appears when 3D Rendering becomes the priority, where it grades C.
RX 9070 offers A-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1080p. It ranks #12 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 1219. The main limitation appears when 3D Rendering becomes the priority, where it grades C.
RX 9070 offers B-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1440p. It ranks #11 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 1219. The main limitation appears when 3D Rendering becomes the priority, where it grades C.
RX 9070 offers D-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 4K. It ranks #10 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 1219. The D grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 9070 offers B-grade capability for AI. It ranks #22 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ai compute index 619. The main limitation appears when 3D Rendering becomes the priority, where it grades C.
RX 9070 offers C-grade capability for 3D Rendering. It ranks #24 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1180. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 9070 offers C-grade capability for Light Use. It ranks #29 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1180. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
FAQ
Do all RX 9070 boards have the same physical design?
No. Dimensions, slot thickness, cooling, power connectors and display outputs belong to the exact board. Use the Exact version selector before checking case or PSU fit.
How much case clearance should I allow for the RX 9070?
Tracked boards range from 280 to 350 mm in length. Select the exact board, then also allow for front radiators or fans, card height, slot thickness and power-cable bend; length alone does not guarantee fit.
Do all RX 9070 boards use the same power connector?
No. Tracked versions use 2x 8-pin or 1x 16-pin or 3x 8-pin. The connector shown in Specifications & compatibility changes with the exact board selection.
Why does Relative Value change when I choose another scenario?
Each scenario changes the weights applied to capability, price and the other published factors. The hardware facts stay fixed, but the value question changes, so its score and rank can change too.
Useful links & sources
offer frame 2026-11-02–2026-11-09 · formula gpu-value-v6.1 · facts facts-2026-11-09 · Relative Value is an estimate from our current dataset, the selected weights and dated market prices — not an official product rating and not a price forecast. Target prices are calculation thresholds, not predictions. Methodology We are not a shop. Affiliate links may earn us a commission; they never change the calculations or the ranking.