RX 7900 XT
The current RX 7900 XT price from retailers, its key specifications, and how it performs for each job.
AMD · GPU · RX 7000
Retailer photo of GIGABYTE RX 7900 XT GAMING OC. View this offer in Where to buy
Works well for: 1080p Gaming, 1440p Gaming, 4K / VR
Trade-offs: you want strong value with Balanced priorities specifically
- VRAM
- 20 GB
- Memory bandwidth
- 800 GB/s
- Board power
- 300 W
- Architecture
- RDNA 3.0
- Interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Move a slider and the page re-scores this product against the same market frame.
What does it cost today, and is that a good price?
Market confidence: MediumAt $1062 the RX 7900 XT is priced 11% below its $1199 representative market level. Only one retailer currently backs that price, so the level is a single data point rather than a market.
Limited market: only one retailer currently has a verified offer, so treat this price as a single data point.
Prices & availability
RX 7900 XT: current price and offers
Compare the offers we track for this model, across variants and retailers.
3 tracked offers · 1 retailers
| Variant | Store | Condition | Price (snapshot) | Value · Balanced | Checked | Offer link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GIGABYTE RX 7900 XT GAMING OC | Newegg | New | $1,062 | 46 | 2026-11-08 | View offer → |
| Sapphire PULSE RX 7900 XT | Newegg | New | $1,199 | 40 | 2026-11-09 | View offer → |
| ASUS TUF RX 7900 XT GAMING OC | Newegg | New | $1,281 | 38 | 2026-11-06 | View offer → |
| RX 7900 XTMultiple variants available | Amazon Affiliate | Varies | Find on Amazon | Not tracked | No price snapshot | Find on Amazon → |
Prices are dated snapshots, not live quotes — confirm the final price at the store. New, refurbished and used offers are listed separately; used offers carry warranty and seller risk.
Performance and where it ranks
Two different questions, side by side. Performance compares what the hardware can do; Value compares what that capability costs at today’s price. A product can rank high on one and low on the other — that gap is the point.
Performance Balanced
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#13 of 54 graded graphics cards
- #10 AMDRX 9070 XT 55
- #11 AMDRadeon AI Pro R9700 55
- #12 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 54
- #13 AMDRX 7900 XT 52
- #14 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 52
- #15 NVIDIARTX 5070 47
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 47
Value Balanced
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#18 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #15 AMDRX 7700 XT 48
- #16 AMDRX 7800 XT 47
- #17 NVIDIARTX 3080 10GB 46
- #18 AMDRX 7900 XT 46
- #19 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 46
- #20 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 45
- #21 NVIDIARTX 5050 45
Performance 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#13 of 54 graded graphics cards
- #10 AMDRX 9070 XT 55
- #11 AMDRadeon AI Pro R9700 55
- #12 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 54
- #13 AMDRX 7900 XT 52
- #14 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 52
- #15 NVIDIARTX 5070 47
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 47
Value 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#18 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #15 AMDRX 7800 XT 48
- #16 NVIDIARTX 3080 10GB 47
- #17 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 47
- #18 AMDRX 7900 XT 46
- #19 IntelArc A380 45
- #20 NVIDIARTX 5050 45
- #21 AMDRX 7900 GRE 44
Performance 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#13 of 54 graded graphics cards
- #10 AMDRX 9070 XT 55
- #11 AMDRadeon AI Pro R9700 55
- #12 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 54
- #13 AMDRX 7900 XT 52
- #14 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 52
- #15 NVIDIARTX 5070 47
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 47
Value 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#18 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #15 AMDRX 7800 XT 48
- #16 IntelArc A380 47
- #17 NVIDIARTX 3080 10GB 47
- #18 AMDRX 7900 XT 47
- #19 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 46
- #20 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 46
- #21 AMDRX 7900 GRE 44
Performance 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#13 of 54 graded graphics cards
- #10 AMDRX 9070 XT 55
- #11 AMDRadeon AI Pro R9700 55
- #12 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 54
- #13 AMDRX 7900 XT 52
- #14 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 52
- #15 NVIDIARTX 5070 47
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 47
Value 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#8 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #5 NVIDIARTX 5070 85
- #6 AMDRX 9070 GRE 84
- #7 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 84
- #8 AMDRX 7900 XT 84
- #9 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 83
- #10 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 78
- #11 NVIDIARTX 5080 77
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#15 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #12 AMDRX 9070 54
- #13 NVIDIARTX 3090 53
- #14 NVIDIARTX 4070 51
- #15 AMDRX 7900 XT 49
- #16 AMDRX 9070 GRE 46
- #17 AMDRX 7900 GRE 46
- #18 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 45
Value Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#14 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #11 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 77
- #12 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 75
- #13 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 72
- #14 AMDRX 7900 XT 71
- #15 IntelArc A750 70
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 70
- #17 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 69
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#14 of 41 graded graphics cards
- #11 AMDRX 9070 47
- #12 NVIDIARTX 3090 47
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 43
- #14 AMDRX 7900 XT 43
- #15 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 39
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 38
- #17 AMDRX 9070 GRE 37
Value Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#13 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #10 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 76
- #11 NVIDIARTX 5060 75
- #12 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 75
- #13 AMDRX 7900 XT 72
- #14 NVIDIARTX 5090 71
- #15 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 70
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 68
Performance Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#12 of 42 graded graphics cards
- #9 NVIDIARTX 3090 41
- #10 AMDRX 9070 40
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 37
- #12 AMDRX 7900 XT 36
- #13 NVIDIARTX 5070 35
- #14 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 34
- #15 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 32
Value Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#9 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5070 76
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 74
- #8 NVIDIARTX 4090 73
- #9 AMDRX 7900 XT 71
- #10 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 70
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4080 69
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 68
Performance AI
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#26 of 52 graded graphics cards
- #23 AMDRX 9070 GRE 16
- #24 NVIDIARTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16
- #25 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 15
- #26 AMDRX 7900 XT 12
- #27 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 12
- #28 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 12
- #29 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 12
Value AI
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#27 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #24 NVIDIARTX 3090 62
- #25 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 62
- #26 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 59
- #27 AMDRX 7900 XT 59
- #28 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 59
- #29 NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada 59
- #30 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 59
Performance 3D Rendering
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#19 of 41 graded graphics cards
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 28
- #17 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 28
- #18 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 28
- #19 AMDRX 7900 XT 24
- #20 NVIDIARTX 5060 24
- #21 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 23
- #22 NVIDIARTX 4060 23
Value 3D Rendering
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#27 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #24 AMDRadeon AI Pro R9700 61
- #25 NVIDIARTX 5060 59
- #26 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 58
- #27 AMDRX 7900 XT 58
- #28 NVIDIARTX 3090 57
- #29 NVIDIARTX 4000 Ada 55
- #30 AMDRX 7900 GRE 54
Performance Light Use
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#45 of 52 graded graphics cards
- #42 NVIDIARTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q 42
- #43 NVIDIARTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 42
- #44 AMDRadeon AI Pro R9700 42
- #45 AMDRX 7900 XT 42
- #46 AMDRX 9070 XT 41
- #47 NVIDIARTX 4080 37
- #48 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 37
Value Light Use
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#40 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #37 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 5
- #38 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 4
- #39 NVIDIARTX 3080 10GB 4
- #40 AMDRX 7900 XT 4
- #41 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 3
- #42 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 3
- #43 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 2
These ladders follow the preset scenario shown above. Your own weights re-score this product, not the whole field.
What it is good for
| Scenario | this productCapability grade · Value at current price | Higher capability | Higher Value with current priorities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced (all-round)Weighted all-round view | GradeNo grade Value46 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT 59 +5% capability | |
| 1080p GamingRaster performance · 1080p | GradeS Value46 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT S 60 +5% capability | |
| 1440p GamingRaster performance · 1440p | GradeS Value47 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT S 60 +5% capability | |
| 4K / VRRaster performance · 4K / VR | GradeA Value84 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT A 100 +5% capability | |
| Ray Tracing @ 1080pRay tracing capability · 1080p | GradeA Value71 | Higher capability RTX 4070 Ti A 69 +27% capability · +19% price | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT A 100 +26% capability |
| Ray Tracing @ 1440pRay tracing capability · 1440p | GradeC Value72 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT B 100 +28% capability | |
| Ray Tracing @ 4KRay tracing capability · 4K | GradeD Value71 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT C 90 +30% capability | |
| AI / Local LLMAI compute · memory and ecosystem fit | GradeB Value59 | Higher capability RTX 4070 Ti B 78 +211% capability · +19% price | Higher Value with current priorities RTX 5070 B 87 +140% capability · -15% price |
| 3D Rendering3D rendering · creator workloads | GradeC Value58 | Higher capability RTX 4070 Ti A 83 +105% capability · +19% price | Higher Value with current priorities RTX 5070 A 92 +72% capability · -15% price |
| Light Use & EfficiencyEfficiency · lighter workloads | GradeC Value4 | Higher capability RX 6400 S 63 +137% capability · -71% price | Higher Value with current priorities Arc A380 S 100 +125% capability · -82% price |
Balanced has no letter: it is a weighting preset, not a capability rubric. A grade answers “how well does this handle that job?” — price is never part of it. Relative Value puts the current market price back in.
Compare these grades with the full tier list
Browse shortlists for different uses
Trade-offs
Works well if
- 1080p Gaming is your main prioritygraded S for 1080p Gaming on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
- FSR 3.1 with frame generation matters to youtemporal upscaler + frame generation, not ML-based — derived from the rdna3 architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value with Balanced priorities specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value with Balanced priorities — the calculation only gets there near $608, against a cheapest tracked $1062
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 59 against its 46 with Balanced priorities. Check on Amazon.
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) is your main useit grades only C there
Works well if
- 1080p is your main priority — S here means 144 Hz+ ultra with headroomgraded S for 1080p on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — 20 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 8 GB grades A for 1080p; this one has 20 GB and hits no memory cap
- FSR 3.1 with frame generation matters to youtemporal upscaler + frame generation, not ML-based — derived from the rdna3 architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for 1080p specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for 1080p — the calculation only gets there near $613, against a cheapest tracked $1062
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 60 against its 46 for 1080p. Check on Amazon.
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) is your main useit grades only C there
Works well if
- 1440p is your main priority — S here means 120 Hz+ at ultra with headroom (~130 fps+), 16 GB VRAMgraded S for 1440p on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — 20 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 12 GB grades A for 1440p; this one has 20 GB and hits no memory cap
- FSR 3.1 with frame generation matters to youtemporal upscaler + frame generation, not ML-based — derived from the rdna3 architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for 1440p specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for 1440p — the calculation only gets there near $622, against a cheapest tracked $1062
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 60 against its 47 for 1440p. Check on Amazon.
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) is your main useit grades only C there
Works well if
- 4K is your main priority — A here means 4K high at 60+ fps native (~70)graded A for 4K on the same rubric as the tier list
- Today's price already clears the strong-value markcheapest tracked $1062 against a $1159 threshold for 4K
- You want memory headroom — 20 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 12 GB grades B for 4K; this one has 20 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 100 against its 84 for 4K. Check on Amazon.
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) is your main useit grades only C there
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1080p is your main priority — A here means playablegraded A for Ray Tracing @ 1080p on the same rubric as the tier list, from 62 fps measured natively (upscaling typically adds 40–60% on top)
- Strong-value threshold: ~$828$828 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for Ray Tracing @ 1080p, in the 2026-11-02–2026-11-09 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade for Ray Tracing @ 1080p — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
Consider other options if
- Current price sits $234 above the strong-value threshold (~$828)cheapest tracked $1062 against a $828 calculated threshold for Ray Tracing @ 1080p
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 100 against its 71 for Ray Tracing @ 1080p. Check on Amazon.
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) is your main useit grades only C there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1440p is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for Ray Tracing @ 1440p, but S for 1080p Gaming
- Strong-value threshold: ~$857$857 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for Ray Tracing @ 1440p, in the 2026-11-02–2026-11-09 offer frame
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 1440p is your main useGraded C; RX 9070 XT reaches B. Check on Amazon.
- Current price sits $205 above the strong-value threshold (~$857)cheapest tracked $1062 against a $857 calculated threshold for Ray Tracing @ 1440p
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 100 against its 72 for Ray Tracing @ 1440p. Check on Amazon.
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 4K is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades D for Ray Tracing @ 4K, but S for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 4K is your main useGraded D; RX 9070 XT reaches C. Check on Amazon.
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 4K specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for Ray Tracing @ 4K — the calculation only gets there near $656, against a cheapest tracked $1062
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 90 against its 71 for Ray Tracing @ 4K. Check on Amazon.
Works well if
- AI is your main prioritygraded B for AI on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — 20 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 10 GB grades C for AI; this one has 20 GB and hits no memory cap
- FSR 3.1 with frame generation matters to youtemporal upscaler + frame generation, not ML-based — derived from the rdna3 architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for AI specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for AI — the calculation only gets there near $579, against a cheapest tracked $1062
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRTX 5070 holds Relative Value 87 against its 59 for AI, at $900
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) is your main useit grades only C there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 3D Rendering is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for 3D Rendering, but S for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 3D Rendering is your main useit grades C there; RTX 4070 Ti grades A at $1267
- You want strong value for 3D Rendering specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for 3D Rendering — the calculation only gets there near $559, against a cheapest tracked $1062
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRTX 5070 holds Relative Value 92 against its 58 for 3D Rendering, at $900
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Light Use is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for Light Use, but S for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Light Use is your main useit grades C there; RX 6400 grades S at $303
- You want strong value for Light Use specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for Light Use per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelArc A380 holds Relative Value 100 against its 4 for Light Use, at $190
Every line states the fact it was derived from, for the scenario selected above. Thresholds are calculated points on our value curve — information about where the maths turns, not instructions about what to pay.
Similar options to the RX 7900 XT
Chosen for Balanced
Chosen for 1080p
Chosen for 1440p
Chosen for 4K
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1080p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1440p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 4K
Chosen for AI
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: CUDA — Many local-LLM and diffusion toolchains are CUDA-only. ROCm and Vulkan builds exist and work, but they are not drop-in — check your toolchain before treating a non-NVIDIA card as an equivalent swap.
Chosen for 3D Rendering
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: OptiX — Blender Cycles reaches its fastest path on NVIDIA OptiX. HIP (AMD) and oneAPI (Intel) render the same scenes, so this is a workflow question, not a capability wall — but render times and add-on support differ.
Chosen for Light Use
Alternatives stay near this product’s price range. Step-up options may exceed the standard budget envelope when the capability gain is meaningful.
More head-to-head comparisons in this category
Upgrade planner
Judge the change in the active scenario, then make the cash gap explicit.
Using page scenarioWhat are you upgrading from? These are the axes we compare on, and where this product stands in the current market.
We rank upgrades by out-of-pocket cost — the new price minus what yours is worth — not by sticker price.
Only candidates that clear the configured meaningful-upgrade gate will be shown; roles are omitted rather than filled.
Capability differences are expressed as tiers and index points, not as benchmark percentages we did not measure.
Specifications and compatibility
What this product is, and what to check before it goes into your build.
Core / Performance
- Architecture
- RDNA 3.0
- GPU chip
- Navi 31
- GPU variant
- Navi 31 XT (215-145000156)
- Process node
- 5 nm
- Transistors
- 57,700 million
- Shading units
- 5376
Memory
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- Varies by version
- Recommended PSU
- Varies by version
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Varies by version313–353 mm across tracked variants
- Height
- Varies by version134–158 mm across tracked variants
- Width
- Varies by version
- Slot thickness
- Varies by version2–4 across tracked variants
- Fans
- Varies by version2–3 across tracked variants
- Cooling
- Varies by version
- Outputs
- Varies by version
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- 3x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 353 mm
- Height
- 158 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 4 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- TUF-RX7900XT-O20G-GAMING
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- 2x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 331 mm
- Height
- 138 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 2× DisplayPort · 2× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-R79XTGAMING OC-20GD
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- 2x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 313 mm
- Height
- 134 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 2× DisplayPort · 2× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- 11323-02-20G
- Vendor warranty
- 2 years
Select an exact version for physical dimensions and connector details.
Show all specifications
Core / Performance
- Texture units
- 336
- ROPs
- 192
- Ray tracing cores
- 84
- Tensor cores
- 0
- Base clock
- 1784 MHz
- Boost clock
- 2534 MHz
Features
- Upscaling
- FSR 3.1
- Frame generation
- frame generation
- Ray tracing
- Supported
- RGB lighting
- No
Warranty & release
- Release year
- 2022
Hover any value to see where it came from: a manufacturer specification, or a figure The Comparator calculated.
Sources: Comparator offer frame 2026-11-02–2026-11-09
What to check in your build
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Select a board to confirm its connector and cable-clearance needs.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Slot occupancy depends on the board cooler and thickness.
Select an exact version above for physical dimensions and connector details.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
3x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 353 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 4 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
2x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 331 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
2x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 313 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
Compare all 3 board variants
| Variant | Length | Slot thickness | Power connector | Recommended PSU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS TUF RX 7900 XT GAMING OC | 353 mm | 4 | 3x 8-pin | 700 W |
| GIGABYTE RX 7900 XT GAMING OC | 331 mm | 2 | 2x 8-pin | 700 W |
| Sapphire PULSE RX 7900 XT | 313 mm | 3 | 2x 8-pin | 700 W |
Found an error? Report this specification Email the field, corrected value and an optional source.
Compatibility guidance is practical help, not a score. Missing data is shown as unknown, never invented.
Summary
RX 7900 XT offers a balanced view across an all-round mix of priorities. It ranks #13 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1350. The main limitation appears when Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) becomes the priority, where it grades C.
RX 7900 XT offers S-grade capability for 1080p. It ranks #13 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1350. The main limitation appears when Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) becomes the priority, where it grades C.
RX 7900 XT offers S-grade capability for 1440p. It ranks #13 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1350. The main limitation appears when Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) becomes the priority, where it grades C.
RX 7900 XT offers A-grade capability for 4K. It ranks #13 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1350. The main limitation appears when Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) becomes the priority, where it grades C.
RX 7900 XT offers A-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1080p. It ranks #15 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 1093. RX 9070 currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RX 7900 XT offers C-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1440p. It ranks #14 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 1093. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 7900 XT offers D-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 4K. It ranks #12 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 1093. The D grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 7900 XT offers B-grade capability for AI. It ranks #26 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ai compute index 442. RX 9070 currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RX 7900 XT offers C-grade capability for 3D Rendering. It ranks #19 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1350. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 7900 XT offers C-grade capability for Light Use. It ranks #45 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1350. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
FAQ
Do all RX 7900 XT boards have the same physical design?
No. Dimensions, slot thickness, cooling, power connectors and display outputs belong to the exact board. Use the Exact version selector before checking case or PSU fit.
How much case clearance should I allow for the RX 7900 XT?
Tracked boards range from 313 to 353 mm in length. Select the exact board, then also allow for front radiators or fans, card height, slot thickness and power-cable bend; length alone does not guarantee fit.
Do all RX 7900 XT boards use the same power connector?
No. Tracked versions use 3x 8-pin or 2x 8-pin. The connector shown in Specifications & compatibility changes with the exact board selection.
Why does Relative Value change when I choose another scenario?
Each scenario changes the weights applied to capability, price and the other published factors. The hardware facts stay fixed, but the value question changes, so its score and rank can change too.
Useful links & sources
offer frame 2026-11-02–2026-11-09 · formula gpu-value-v6.1 · facts facts-2026-11-09 · Relative Value is an estimate from our current dataset, the selected weights and dated market prices — not an official product rating and not a price forecast. Target prices are calculation thresholds, not predictions. Methodology We are not a shop. Affiliate links may earn us a commission; they never change the calculations or the ranking.