RX 6500 XT 4GB
The current RX 6500 XT 4GB price from retailers, its key specifications, and how it performs for each job.
AMD · GPU · RX 6000
Retailer photo of GIGABYTE RX 6500 XT EAGLE. View this offer in Where to buy
Works well for: Light Use & Efficiency
Trade-offs: you want strong value with Balanced priorities specifically
- VRAM
- 4 GB
- Memory bandwidth
- 144 GB/s
- Board power
- 107 W
- Architecture
- RDNA 2.0
- Interface
- PCIe 4.0 x4
Move a slider and the page re-scores this product against the same market frame.
What does it cost today, and is that a good price?
Market confidence: MediumAt $230 the RX 6500 XT 4GB is priced 13% below its $264 representative market level. Only one retailer currently backs that price, so the level is a single data point rather than a market.
Limited market: only one retailer currently has a verified offer, so treat this price as a single data point.
Prices & availability
RX 6500 XT 4GB: current price and offers
Compare the offers we track for this model, across variants and retailers.
2 tracked offers · 1 retailers
| Variant | Store | Condition | Price (snapshot) | Value · Balanced | Checked | Offer link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GIGABYTE RX 6500 XT EAGLE | Newegg | New | $230 | 42 | 2026-11-09 | View offer → |
| ASUS DUAL RX 6500 XT OC | Newegg | New | $298 | 32 | 2026-11-09 | View offer → |
| RX 6500 XT 4GBMultiple variants available | Amazon Affiliate | Varies | Find on Amazon | Not tracked | No price snapshot | Find on Amazon → |
Prices are dated snapshots, not live quotes — confirm the final price at the store. New, refurbished and used offers are listed separately; used offers carry warranty and seller risk.
Performance and where it ranks
Two different questions, side by side. Performance compares what the hardware can do; Value compares what that capability costs at today’s price. A product can rank high on one and low on the other — that gap is the point.
Performance Balanced
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#51 of 54 graded graphics cards
- #48 AMDRX 6600 16
- #49 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 14
- #50 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 10
- #51 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 8
- #52 NVIDIAGTX 1650 7
- #53 IntelArc A380 6
- #54 AMDRX 6400 5
Value Balanced
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#24 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #21 NVIDIARTX 5050 45
- #22 AMDRX 7900 GRE 44
- #23 NVIDIARTX 4070 43
- #24 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 42
- #25 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 41
- #26 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 40
- #27 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 38
Performance 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#51 of 54 graded graphics cards
- #48 AMDRX 6600 16
- #49 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 14
- #50 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 10
- #51 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 8
- #52 NVIDIAGTX 1650 7
- #53 IntelArc A380 6
- #54 AMDRX 6400 5
Value 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#25 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #22 NVIDIARTX 4070 44
- #23 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 42
- #24 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 42
- #25 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 41
- #26 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 41
- #27 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 40
- #28 NVIDIARTX 4060 39
Performance 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#51 of 54 graded graphics cards
- #48 AMDRX 6600 16
- #49 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 14
- #50 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 10
- #51 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 8
- #52 NVIDIAGTX 1650 7
- #53 IntelArc A380 6
- #54 AMDRX 6400 5
Value 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#26 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #23 NVIDIARTX 4070 44
- #24 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 42
- #25 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 40
- #26 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 40
- #27 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 38
- #28 NVIDIARTX 4060 37
- #29 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 36
Performance 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#51 of 54 graded graphics cards
- #48 AMDRX 6600 16
- #49 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 14
- #50 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 10
- #51 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 8
- #52 NVIDIAGTX 1650 7
- #53 IntelArc A380 6
- #54 AMDRX 6400 5
Value 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#48 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #45 IntelArc A380 34
- #46 NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada 32
- #47 NVIDIARTX 4000 Ada 32
- #48 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 31
- #49 AMDRX 6400 21
- #50 NVIDIAGTX 1650 19
- #51 NVIDIARTX A2000 17
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#38 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #34 AMDRX 6600 XT 14
- #35 AMDRX 7600 13
- #36 AMDRX 6600 10
- #37 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 9
- #38 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 6
- #39 IntelArc A380 6
- #40 AMDRX 6400 5
Value Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#41 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #38 AMDRX 6600 XT 34
- #39 IntelArc A380 32
- #40 AMDRX 6600 28
- #41 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 27
- #42 AMDRX 6400 20
- #43 IntelIntel Arc Pro B60 11
- #44 NVIDIAGTX 1650 10
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#40 of 41 graded graphics cards
- #35 AMDRX 7600 9
- #36 AMDRX 6600 XT 9
- #37 AMDRX 6600 8
- #38 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 6
- #39 IntelArc A380 4
- #40 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 4
- #41 AMDRX 6400 3
Value Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#41 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #38 AMDRX 6600 XT 33
- #39 IntelArc A380 30
- #40 AMDRX 6600 27
- #41 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 25
- #42 AMDRX 6400 18
- #43 IntelIntel Arc Pro B60 12
- #44 NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada 11
Performance Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#40 of 42 graded graphics cards
Value Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#41 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #38 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 25
- #39 AMDRX 6600 24
- #40 IntelArc A380 21
- #41 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 18
- #42 IntelIntel Arc Pro B60 15
- #43 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 15
- #44 AMDRadeon AI Pro R9700 15
Performance AI
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#51 of 52 graded graphics cards
- #46 IntelArc B580 3
- #47 IntelIntel Arc Pro B60 3
- #48 AMDRX 6600 XT 2
- #49 IntelArc A380 2
- #50 AMDRX 6600 2
- #51 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 1
- #52 AMDRX 6400 1
Value AI
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#52 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #49 NVIDIAGTX 1650 30
- #50 AMDRX 6600 XT 23
- #51 AMDRX 6600 22
- #52 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 20
- #53 AMDRX 6400 16
- #54 NVIDIARTX A2000 7
- #55 NVIDIARTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 4
Performance Light Use
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#9 of 52 graded graphics cards
- #6 NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada 96
- #7 IntelArc A380 95
- #8 NVIDIAGTX 1650 95
- #9 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 87
- #10 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 86
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4060 86
- #12 NVIDIARTX 5050 82
Value Light Use
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#4 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #1 IntelArc A380 100
- #2 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 100
- #3 AMDRX 6400 63
- #4 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 57
- #5 IntelArc A750 43
- #6 IntelArc B580 32
- #7 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 30
These ladders follow the preset scenario shown above. Your own weights re-score this product, not the whole field.
What it is good for
| Scenario | this productCapability grade · Value at current price | Higher capability | Higher Value with current priorities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced (all-round)Weighted all-round view | GradeNo grade Value42 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities Arc A750 100 +160% capability · -9% price | |
| 1080p GamingRaster performance · 1080p | GradeD Value41 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities Arc A750 B 100 +160% capability · -9% price | |
| 1440p GamingRaster performance · 1440p | GradeF Value40 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities Arc A750 C 100 +160% capability · -9% price | |
| 4K / VRRaster performance · 4K / VR | GradeF Value31 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities Arc A750 F 76 +160% capability · -9% price | |
| Ray Tracing @ 1080pRay tracing capability · 1080p | GradeF Value27 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RTX 3050 6GB F 36 +46% capability · +9% price | |
| Ray Tracing @ 1440pRay tracing capability · 1440p | GradeF Value25 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities Arc A750 F 68 +230% capability · -9% price | |
| Ray Tracing @ 4KRay tracing capability · 4K | GradeF Value18 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities Arc A750 F 45 +62% capability · -9% price | |
| AI / Local LLMAI compute · memory and ecosystem fit | GradeF Value20 | Higher capability RTX 3050 6GB D 59 +447% capability · +9% price | Higher Value with current priorities Arc A750 C 66 ⚠ not a drop-in swap +431% capability · -9% price |
| Light Use & EfficiencyEfficiency · lighter workloads | GradeA Value57 | Higher capability RTX 3050 6GB S 100 +10% capability · +9% price | Higher Value with current priorities Arc A380 S 100 +9% capability · -17% price |
Balanced has no letter: it is a weighting preset, not a capability rubric. A grade answers “how well does this handle that job?” — price is never part of it. Relative Value puts the current market price back in.
Compare these grades with the full tier list
Browse shortlists for different uses
Trade-offs
Works well if
- Light Use & Efficiency is your main prioritygraded A for Light Use & Efficiency on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
- FSR 3.1 with frame generation matters to youtemporal upscaler + frame generation, not ML-based — derived from the rdna2 architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value with Balanced priorities specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value with Balanced priorities — the calculation only gets there near $120, against a cheapest tracked $230
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelArc A750 holds Relative Value 100 against its 42 with Balanced priorities, at $210
- Not the pick if 1440p Gaming is your main useit grades only F there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 1080p is not actually your main job — Light Use & Efficiency isit grades D for 1080p, but A for Light Use & Efficiency
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 1080p is your main useit grades D there; Arc A750 grades B at $210
- You want strong value for 1080p specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for 1080p — the calculation only gets there near $119, against a cheapest tracked $230
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelArc A750 holds Relative Value 100 against its 41 for 1080p, at $210
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 1440p is not actually your main job — Light Use & Efficiency isit grades F for 1440p, but A for Light Use & Efficiency
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 1440p is your main useit grades F there; Arc A750 grades C at $210
- You want strong value for 1440p specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for 1440p — the calculation only gets there near $115, against a cheapest tracked $230
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelArc A750 holds Relative Value 100 against its 40 for 1440p, at $210
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 4K is not actually your main job — Light Use & Efficiency isit grades F for 4K, but A for Light Use & Efficiency
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 4K is your main useit grades F there; Arc A750 grades F at $210
- You want strong value for 4K specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for 4K per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelArc A750 holds Relative Value 76 against its 31 for 4K, at $210
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1080p is not actually your main job — Light Use & Efficiency isit grades F for Ray Tracing @ 1080p, but A for Light Use & Efficiency
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 1080p is your main useit grades F there; RTX 3050 6GB grades F at $250
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 1080p specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for Ray Tracing @ 1080p per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- You are buying for Ray Tracing @ 1080p and want no asterisksthe rubric caps this grade: fps estimated (medium confidence), not measured
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1440p is not actually your main job — Light Use & Efficiency isit grades F for Ray Tracing @ 1440p, but A for Light Use & Efficiency
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 1440p is your main useit grades F there; Arc A750 grades F at $210
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 1440p specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for Ray Tracing @ 1440p per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelArc A750 holds Relative Value 68 against its 25 for Ray Tracing @ 1440p, at $210
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 4K is not actually your main job — Light Use & Efficiency isit grades F for Ray Tracing @ 4K, but A for Light Use & Efficiency
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 4K is your main useit grades F there; Arc A750 grades F at $210
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 4K specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for Ray Tracing @ 4K per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelArc A750 holds Relative Value 45 against its 18 for Ray Tracing @ 4K, at $210
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- AI is not actually your main job — Light Use & Efficiency isit grades F for AI, but A for Light Use & Efficiency
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if AI is your main useit grades F there; RTX 3050 6GB grades D at $250
- You want strong value for AI specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for AI per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelArc A750 holds Relative Value 66 against its 20 for AI, at $210
Works well if
- Light Use is your main prioritygraded A for Light Use on the same rubric as the tier list
- Strong-value threshold: ~$183$183 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for Light Use, in the 2026-11-02–2026-11-09 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade for Light Use — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
Consider other options if
- Current price sits $47 above the strong-value threshold (~$183)cheapest tracked $230 against a $183 calculated threshold for Light Use
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelArc A380 holds Relative Value 100 against its 57 for Light Use, at $190
- Not the pick if 1440p Gaming is your main useit grades only F there
Every line states the fact it was derived from, for the scenario selected above. Thresholds are calculated points on our value curve — information about where the maths turns, not instructions about what to pay.
Similar options to the RX 6500 XT 4GB
Chosen for Balanced
Chosen for 1080p
Chosen for 1440p
Chosen for 4K
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1080p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1440p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 4K
Chosen for AI
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: CUDA — Many local-LLM and diffusion toolchains are CUDA-only. ROCm and Vulkan builds exist and work, but they are not drop-in — check your toolchain before treating a non-NVIDIA card as an equivalent swap.
Chosen for Light Use
Alternatives stay near this product’s price range. Step-up options may exceed the standard budget envelope when the capability gain is meaningful.
More head-to-head comparisons in this category
Upgrade planner
Judge the change in the active scenario, then make the cash gap explicit.
Using page scenarioWhat are you upgrading from? These are the axes we compare on, and where this product stands in the current market.
We rank upgrades by out-of-pocket cost — the new price minus what yours is worth — not by sticker price.
Only candidates that clear the configured meaningful-upgrade gate will be shown; roles are omitted rather than filled.
Capability differences are expressed as tiers and index points, not as benchmark percentages we did not measure.
Specifications and compatibility
What this product is, and what to check before it goes into your build.
Core / Performance
- Architecture
- RDNA 2.0
- GPU chip
- Navi 24
- GPU variant
- Navi 24 XT (215-135000006)
- Process node
- 6 nm
- Transistors
- 5,400 million
- Shading units
- 1024
Memory
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 107 W
- Power connector
- Varies by version
- Recommended PSU
- Varies by version
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x4
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Varies by version192–201 mm across tracked variants
- Height
- Varies by version117–128 mm across tracked variants
- Width
- Varies by version
- Slot thickness
- Varies by version2 across tracked variants
- Fans
- Varies by version2 across tracked variants
- Cooling
- Varies by version
- Outputs
- Varies by version
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 107 W
- Power connector
- 1x 6-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 300 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x4
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 201 mm
- Height
- 128 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 1× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- DUAL-RX6500XT-O4G
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 107 W
- Power connector
- 1x 6-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 300 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x4
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 192 mm
- Height
- 117 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 1× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-R65XTEAGLE-4GD
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Select an exact version for physical dimensions and connector details.
Show all specifications
Core / Performance
- Texture units
- 64
- ROPs
- 32
- Ray tracing cores
- 16
- Tensor cores
- 0
- Base clock
- 2310 MHz
- Boost clock
- 2815 MHz
Features
- Upscaling
- FSR 3.1
- Frame generation
- frame generation
- Ray tracing
- Supported
- RGB lighting
- No
Warranty & release
- Release year
- 2022
Hover any value to see where it came from: a manufacturer specification, or a figure The Comparator calculated.
Sources: Comparator offer frame 2026-11-02–2026-11-09
What to check in your build
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Select a board to confirm its connector and cable-clearance needs.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Slot occupancy depends on the board cooler and thickness.
Select an exact version above for physical dimensions and connector details.
300 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 6-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 201 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
300 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 6-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 192 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
Compare all 2 board variants
| Variant | Length | Slot thickness | Power connector | Recommended PSU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS DUAL RX 6500 XT OC | 201 mm | 2 | 1x 6-pin | 300 W |
| GIGABYTE RX 6500 XT EAGLE | 192 mm | 2 | 1x 6-pin | 300 W |
Found an error? Report this specification Email the field, corrected value and an optional source.
Compatibility guidance is practical help, not a score. Missing data is shown as unknown, never invented.
Summary
RX 6500 XT 4GB offers a balanced view across an all-round mix of priorities. It ranks #51 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 200. The main limitation appears when 1440p Gaming becomes the priority, where it grades F.
RX 6500 XT 4GB offers D-grade capability for 1080p. It ranks #51 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 200. The D grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 6500 XT 4GB offers F-grade capability for 1440p. It ranks #51 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 200. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 6500 XT 4GB offers F-grade capability for 4K. It ranks #51 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 200. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 6500 XT 4GB offers F-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1080p. It ranks #38 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 149. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 6500 XT 4GB offers F-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1440p. It ranks #40 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 149. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 6500 XT 4GB offers F-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 4K. It ranks #40 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 149. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 6500 XT 4GB offers F-grade capability for AI. It ranks #51 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ai compute index 49. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 6500 XT 4GB offers A-grade capability for Light Use. It ranks #9 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 200. Arc A380 currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
FAQ
Do all RX 6500 XT 4GB boards have the same physical design?
No. Dimensions, slot thickness, cooling, power connectors and display outputs belong to the exact board. Use the Exact version selector before checking case or PSU fit.
How much case clearance should I allow for the RX 6500 XT 4GB?
Tracked boards range from 192 to 201 mm in length. Select the exact board, then also allow for front radiators or fans, card height, slot thickness and power-cable bend; length alone does not guarantee fit.
Why does Relative Value change when I choose another scenario?
Each scenario changes the weights applied to capability, price and the other published factors. The hardware facts stay fixed, but the value question changes, so its score and rank can change too.
Why can Amazon appear without a tracked price?
Amazon listing snapshots can participate in Value while fresh. We show Check on Amazon instead of its price; confirm the current price and availability at the store. When no current listing snapshot exists, Amazon is a search link only.
Useful links & sources
offer frame 2026-11-02–2026-11-09 · formula gpu-value-v6.1 · facts facts-2026-11-09 · Relative Value is an estimate from our current dataset, the selected weights and dated market prices — not an official product rating and not a price forecast. Target prices are calculation thresholds, not predictions. Methodology We are not a shop. Affiliate links may earn us a commission; they never change the calculations or the ranking.