RTX 4070
The current RTX 4070 price from retailers, its key specifications, and how it performs for each job.
NVIDIA · GPU · RTX 40
Retailer photo of GIGABYTE RTX 4070 WINDFORCE OC. View this offer in Where to buy
Works well for: 1080p Gaming, 1440p Gaming, Ray Tracing @ 1080p
Trade-offs: you want strong value with Balanced priorities specifically
- VRAM
- 12 GB
- Memory bandwidth
- 504 GB/s
- Board power
- 200 W
- Architecture
- Ada Lovelace
- Interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Move a slider and the page re-scores this product against the same market frame.
What does it cost today, and is that a good price?
Market confidence: MediumAt $897 the RTX 4070 is priced in line with its $898 representative market level. Only one retailer currently backs that price, so the level is a single data point rather than a market.
Limited market: only one retailer currently has a verified offer, so treat this price as a single data point.
Prices & availability
RTX 4070: current price and offers
Compare the offers we track for this model, across variants and retailers.
2 tracked offers · 1 retailers
| Variant | Store | Condition | Price (snapshot) | Value · Balanced | Checked | Offer link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS DUAL RTX 4070 EVO OC GDDR6 | Newegg | New | $899 | 44 | 2026-11-09 | View offer → |
| GIGABYTE RTX 4070 WINDFORCE OC | Newegg | New | $897 | 43 | 2026-11-09 | View offer → |
| RTX 4070Multiple variants available | Amazon Affiliate | Varies | Find on Amazon | Not tracked | No price snapshot | Find on Amazon → |
Prices are dated snapshots, not live quotes — confirm the final price at the store. New, refurbished and used offers are listed separately; used offers carry warranty and seller risk.
Performance and where it ranks
Two different questions, side by side. Performance compares what the hardware can do; Value compares what that capability costs at today’s price. A product can rank high on one and low on the other — that gap is the point.
Performance Balanced
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#26 of 54 graded graphics cards
- #23 AMDRX 9070 GRE 40
- #24 AMDRX 7800 XT 40
- #25 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 39
- #26 NVIDIARTX 4070 39
- #27 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 37
- #28 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 37
- #29 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 33
Value Balanced
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#23 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #20 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 45
- #21 NVIDIARTX 5050 45
- #22 AMDRX 7900 GRE 44
- #23 NVIDIARTX 4070 43
- #24 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 42
- #25 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 41
- #26 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 40
Performance 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#26 of 54 graded graphics cards
- #23 AMDRX 9070 GRE 40
- #24 AMDRX 7800 XT 40
- #25 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 39
- #26 NVIDIARTX 4070 39
- #27 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 37
- #28 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 37
- #29 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 33
Value 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#22 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #19 IntelArc A380 45
- #20 NVIDIARTX 5050 45
- #21 AMDRX 7900 GRE 44
- #22 NVIDIARTX 4070 44
- #23 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 42
- #24 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 42
- #25 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 41
Performance 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#26 of 54 graded graphics cards
- #23 AMDRX 9070 GRE 40
- #24 AMDRX 7800 XT 40
- #25 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 39
- #26 NVIDIARTX 4070 39
- #27 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 37
- #28 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 37
- #29 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 33
Value 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#23 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #20 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 46
- #21 AMDRX 7900 GRE 44
- #22 NVIDIARTX 5050 44
- #23 NVIDIARTX 4070 44
- #24 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 42
- #25 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 40
- #26 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 40
Performance 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#26 of 54 graded graphics cards
- #23 AMDRX 9070 GRE 40
- #24 AMDRX 7800 XT 40
- #25 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 39
- #26 NVIDIARTX 4070 39
- #27 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 37
- #28 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 37
- #29 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 33
Value 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#19 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #16 NVIDIARTX 5060 75
- #17 AMDRX 7900 GRE 74
- #18 NVIDIARTX 5090 71
- #19 NVIDIARTX 4070 70
- #20 AMDRX 7700 XT 68
- #21 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 67
- #22 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 67
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#14 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 58
- #12 AMDRX 9070 54
- #13 NVIDIARTX 3090 53
- #14 NVIDIARTX 4070 51
- #15 AMDRX 7900 XT 49
- #16 AMDRX 9070 GRE 46
- #17 AMDRX 7900 GRE 46
Value Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#16 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #13 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 72
- #14 AMDRX 7900 XT 71
- #15 IntelArc A750 70
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 70
- #17 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 69
- #18 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 69
- #19 NVIDIARTX 5090 68
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#16 of 41 graded graphics cards
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 43
- #14 AMDRX 7900 XT 43
- #15 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 39
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 38
- #17 AMDRX 9070 GRE 37
- #18 NVIDIARTX 3080 10GB 34
- #19 AMDRX 7900 GRE 34
Value Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#17 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #14 NVIDIARTX 5090 71
- #15 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 70
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 68
- #17 NVIDIARTX 4070 68
- #18 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 68
- #19 IntelArc A750 68
- #20 AMDRX 7900 GRE 67
Performance Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#16 of 42 graded graphics cards
- #13 NVIDIARTX 5070 35
- #14 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 34
- #15 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 32
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 30
- #17 AMDRX 7900 GRE 27
- #18 AMDRX 9070 GRE 24
- #19 AMDRX 7800 XT 24
Value Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#20 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #17 AMDRX 7900 GRE 64
- #18 IntelArc B580 63
- #19 AMDRX 7800 XT 61
- #20 NVIDIARTX 4070 61
- #21 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 60
- #22 NVIDIARTX 5060 57
- #23 AMDRX 7700 XT 55
Performance AI
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#16 of 52 graded graphics cards
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 32
- #14 NVIDIARTX 5070 28
- #15 NVIDIARTX 3080 10GB 27
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 27
- #17 NVIDIARTX 4000 Ada 24
- #18 AMDRX 9070 XT 22
- #19 AMDRadeon AI Pro R9700 22
Value AI
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#10 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #7 AMDRX 9070 83
- #8 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 82
- #9 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 82
- #10 NVIDIARTX 4070 80
- #11 AMDRadeon AI Pro R9700 79
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 78
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4090 76
Performance 3D Rendering
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#12 of 41 graded graphics cards
- #9 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 46
- #10 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 42
- #11 NVIDIARTX 5070 41
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4070 41
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 40
- #14 NVIDIARTX 3090 35
- #15 NVIDIARTX 3080 10GB 31
Value 3D Rendering
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#11 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #8 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 83
- #9 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 83
- #10 AMDRX 9070 82
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4070 81
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4080 79
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4090 78
- #14 NVIDIARTX 3080 10GB 78
Performance Light Use
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#26 of 52 graded graphics cards
- #23 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 70
- #24 IntelArc B580 68
- #25 IntelIntel Arc Pro B60 66
- #26 NVIDIARTX 4070 66
- #27 AMDRX 9070 GRE 62
- #28 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 61
- #29 AMDRX 9070 61
Value Light Use
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#29 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #26 IntelIntel Arc Pro B60 9
- #27 AMDRX 7700 XT 9
- #28 NVIDIARTX 5070 8
- #29 NVIDIARTX 4070 7
- #30 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 7
- #31 AMDRX 9070 XT 7
- #32 AMDRX 7800 XT 6
These ladders follow the preset scenario shown above. Your own weights re-score this product, not the whole field.
What it is good for
| Scenario | this productCapability grade · Value at current price | Higher capability | Higher Value with current priorities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced (all-round)Weighted all-round view | GradeNo grade Value43 | Higher capability RX 9070 XT 59 +42% capability | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9060 XT 8GB 79 -5% capability · -49% price |
| 1080p GamingRaster performance · 1080p | GradeS Value44 | Higher capability RX 9070 XT S 60 +42% capability | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9060 XT 8GB A 86 -5% capability · -49% price |
| 1440p GamingRaster performance · 1440p | GradeA Value44 | Higher capability RX 9070 XT S 60 +42% capability | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9060 XT 8GB B 77 -5% capability · -49% price |
| 4K / VRRaster performance · 4K / VR | GradeC Value70 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT A 100 +42% capability | |
| Ray Tracing @ 1080pRay tracing capability · 1080p | GradeA Value70 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT A 100 +22% capability | |
| Ray Tracing @ 1440pRay tracing capability · 1440p | GradeC Value68 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT B 100 +44% capability | |
| Ray Tracing @ 4KRay tracing capability · 4K | GradeF Value61 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT C 90 +56% capability | |
| AI / Local LLMAI compute · memory and ecosystem fit | GradeB Value80 | Higher capability RTX 4070 Super B 87 +22% capability · +8% price | Higher Value with current priorities RTX 5070 B 87 +6% capability · +0% price |
| 3D Rendering3D rendering · creator workloads | GradeA Value81 | — | Higher Value with current priorities RTX 5070 A 92 +1% capability · +0% price |
| Light Use & EfficiencyEfficiency · lighter workloads | GradeB Value7 | Higher capability RX 6400 S 63 +53% capability · -66% price | Higher Value with current priorities Arc A380 S 100 +45% capability · -79% price |
Balanced has no letter: it is a weighting preset, not a capability rubric. A grade answers “how well does this handle that job?” — price is never part of it. Relative Value puts the current market price back in.
Compare these grades with the full tier list
Browse shortlists for different uses
Trade-offs
Works well if
- 1080p Gaming is your main prioritygraded S for 1080p Gaming on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
- DLSS 4.5 with frame generation matters to yousecond-generation transformer upscaler + frame generation — derived from the ada architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value with Balanced priorities specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value with Balanced priorities — the calculation only gets there near $484, against a cheapest tracked $897
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9060 XT 8GB holds Relative Value 79 against its 43 with Balanced priorities, at $460
- Not the pick if 4K / VR is your main useit grades only C there
Works well if
- 1080p is your main priority — S here means 144 Hz+ ultra with headroomgraded S for 1080p on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — 12 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 8 GB grades A for 1080p; this one has 12 GB and hits no memory cap
- DLSS 4.5 with frame generation matters to yousecond-generation transformer upscaler + frame generation — derived from the ada architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for 1080p specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for 1080p — the calculation only gets there near $491, against a cheapest tracked $897
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9060 XT 8GB holds Relative Value 86 against its 44 for 1080p, at $460
- Not the pick if 4K / VR is your main useit grades only C there
Works well if
- 1440p is your main priority — A here means confident 90–130 fps at high settings, 12 GB+ VRAMgraded A for 1440p on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — 12 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 10 GB grades B for 1440p; this one has 12 GB and hits no memory cap
- DLSS 4.5 with frame generation matters to yousecond-generation transformer upscaler + frame generation — derived from the ada architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for 1440p specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for 1440p — the calculation only gets there near $492, against a cheapest tracked $897
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9060 XT 8GB holds Relative Value 77 against its 44 for 1440p, at $460
- Not the pick if 4K / VR is your main useit grades only C there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 4K is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for 4K, but S for 1080p Gaming
- Strong-value threshold: ~$682$682 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for 4K, in the 2026-11-02–2026-11-09 offer frame
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 4K is your main useGraded C; RX 9070 XT reaches A. Check on Amazon.
- Current price sits $215 above the strong-value threshold (~$682)cheapest tracked $897 against a $682 calculated threshold for 4K
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1080p is your main priority — A here means playablegraded A for Ray Tracing @ 1080p on the same rubric as the tier list, from 64 fps measured natively (upscaling typically adds 40–60% on top)
- Strong-value threshold: ~$681$681 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for Ray Tracing @ 1080p, in the 2026-11-02–2026-11-09 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade for Ray Tracing @ 1080p — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
Consider other options if
- Current price sits $216 above the strong-value threshold (~$681)cheapest tracked $897 against a $681 calculated threshold for Ray Tracing @ 1080p
- Not the pick if 4K / VR is your main useit grades only C there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1440p is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for Ray Tracing @ 1440p, but S for 1080p Gaming
- Strong-value threshold: ~$645$645 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for Ray Tracing @ 1440p, in the 2026-11-02–2026-11-09 offer frame
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 1440p is your main useGraded C; RX 9070 XT reaches B. Check on Amazon.
- Current price sits $252 above the strong-value threshold (~$645)cheapest tracked $897 against a $645 calculated threshold for Ray Tracing @ 1440p
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 4K is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades F for Ray Tracing @ 4K, but S for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 4K is your main useGraded F; RX 9070 XT reaches C. Check on Amazon.
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 4K specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for Ray Tracing @ 4K — the calculation only gets there near $317, against a cheapest tracked $897
Works well if
- AI is your main prioritygraded B for AI on the same rubric as the tier list
- Strong-value threshold: ~$892$892 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for AI, in the 2026-11-02–2026-11-09 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — 12 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 10 GB grades C for AI; this one has 12 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Current price sits $5 above the strong-value threshold (~$892)cheapest tracked $897 against a $892 calculated threshold for AI
- Not the pick if 4K / VR is your main useit grades only C there
Works well if
- 3D Rendering is your main prioritygraded A for 3D Rendering on the same rubric as the tier list
- Today's price already clears the strong-value markcheapest tracked $897 against a $923 threshold for 3D Rendering
- You want memory headroom — 12 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 6 GB grades C for 3D Rendering; this one has 12 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 4K / VR is your main useit grades only C there
Works well if
- Light Use is your main prioritygraded B for Light Use on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade for Light Use — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
- DLSS 4.5 with frame generation matters to yousecond-generation transformer upscaler + frame generation — derived from the ada architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for Light Use specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for Light Use per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelArc A380 holds Relative Value 100 against its 7 for Light Use, at $190
- Not the pick if 4K / VR is your main useit grades only C there
Every line states the fact it was derived from, for the scenario selected above. Thresholds are calculated points on our value curve — information about where the maths turns, not instructions about what to pay.
Similar options to the RTX 4070
Chosen for Balanced
Chosen for 1080p
Chosen for 1440p
Chosen for 4K
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1080p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1440p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 4K
Chosen for AI
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: CUDA — Many local-LLM and diffusion toolchains are CUDA-only. ROCm and Vulkan builds exist and work, but they are not drop-in — check your toolchain before treating a non-NVIDIA card as an equivalent swap.
Chosen for 3D Rendering
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: OptiX — Blender Cycles reaches its fastest path on NVIDIA OptiX. HIP (AMD) and oneAPI (Intel) render the same scenes, so this is a workflow question, not a capability wall — but render times and add-on support differ.
Chosen for Light Use
Alternatives stay near this product’s price range. Step-up options may exceed the standard budget envelope when the capability gain is meaningful.
More head-to-head comparisons in this category
Upgrade planner
Judge the change in the active scenario, then make the cash gap explicit.
Using page scenarioWhat are you upgrading from? These are the axes we compare on, and where this product stands in the current market.
We rank upgrades by out-of-pocket cost — the new price minus what yours is worth — not by sticker price.
Only candidates that clear the configured meaningful-upgrade gate will be shown; roles are omitted rather than filled.
Capability differences are expressed as tiers and index points, not as benchmark percentages we did not measure.
Specifications and compatibility
What this product is, and what to check before it goes into your build.
Core / Performance
- Architecture
- Ada Lovelace
- GPU chip
- AD104
- GPU variant
- AD104-250-A1
- Process node
- 5 nm
- Transistors
- 35,800 million
- Shading units
- 5888
Memory
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 200 W
- Power connector
- Varies by version
- Recommended PSU
- Varies by version
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Varies by version227–261 mm across tracked variants
- Height
- Varies by version123–126 mm across tracked variants
- Width
- Varies by version
- Slot thickness
- Varies by version2 across tracked variants
- Fans
- Varies by version2 across tracked variants
- Cooling
- Varies by version
- Outputs
- Varies by version
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 200 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 550 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 227 mm
- Height
- 123 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- DUAL-RTX4070-O12GD6-EVO
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 200 W
- Power connector
- 1x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 550 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 261 mm
- Height
- 126 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-N4070WF3OC-12GD
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Select an exact version for physical dimensions and connector details.
Show all specifications
Core / Performance
- Texture units
- 184
- ROPs
- 64
- Ray tracing cores
- 46
- Tensor cores
- 184
- Base clock
- 1920 MHz
- Boost clock
- 2490 MHz
Features
- Upscaling
- DLSS 4.5
- Frame generation
- frame generation
- Ray tracing
- Supported
- RGB lighting
- No
Warranty & release
- Release year
- 2023
Hover any value to see where it came from: a manufacturer specification, or a figure The Comparator calculated.
Sources: Comparator offer frame 2026-11-02–2026-11-09
What to check in your build
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Select a board to confirm its connector and cable-clearance needs.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Slot occupancy depends on the board cooler and thickness.
Select an exact version above for physical dimensions and connector details.
550 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 227 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
550 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 261 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
Compare all 2 board variants
| Variant | Length | Slot thickness | Power connector | Recommended PSU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS DUAL RTX 4070 EVO OC GDDR6 | 227 mm | 2 | 1x 16-pin | 550 W |
| GIGABYTE RTX 4070 WINDFORCE OC | 261 mm | 2 | 1x 8-pin | 550 W |
Found an error? Report this specification Email the field, corrected value and an optional source.
Compatibility guidance is practical help, not a score. Missing data is shown as unknown, never invented.
Summary
RTX 4070 offers a balanced view across an all-round mix of priorities. It ranks #26 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1000. RX 9060 XT 8GB currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RTX 4070 offers S-grade capability for 1080p. It ranks #26 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1000. RX 9070 currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RTX 4070 offers A-grade capability for 1440p. It ranks #26 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1000. RX 9070 currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RTX 4070 offers C-grade capability for 4K. It ranks #26 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1000. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RTX 4070 offers A-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1080p. It ranks #14 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 1000. RX 9070 currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RTX 4070 offers C-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1440p. It ranks #16 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 1000. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RTX 4070 offers F-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 4K. It ranks #16 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 1000. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RTX 4070 offers B-grade capability for AI. It ranks #16 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ai compute index 1000. The main limitation appears when 4K / VR becomes the priority, where it grades C.
RTX 4070 offers A-grade capability for 3D Rendering. It ranks #12 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1000. The main limitation appears when 4K / VR becomes the priority, where it grades C.
RTX 4070 offers B-grade capability for Light Use. It ranks #26 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1000. Arc B580 currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
FAQ
Do all RTX 4070 boards have the same physical design?
No. Dimensions, slot thickness, cooling, power connectors and display outputs belong to the exact board. Use the Exact version selector before checking case or PSU fit.
How much case clearance should I allow for the RTX 4070?
Tracked boards range from 227 to 261 mm in length. Select the exact board, then also allow for front radiators or fans, card height, slot thickness and power-cable bend; length alone does not guarantee fit.
Do all RTX 4070 boards use the same power connector?
No. Tracked versions use 1x 16-pin or 1x 8-pin. The connector shown in Specifications & compatibility changes with the exact board selection.
Why does Relative Value change when I choose another scenario?
Each scenario changes the weights applied to capability, price and the other published factors. The hardware facts stay fixed, but the value question changes, so its score and rank can change too.
Useful links & sources
offer frame 2026-11-02–2026-11-09 · formula gpu-value-v6.1 · facts facts-2026-11-09 · Relative Value is an estimate from our current dataset, the selected weights and dated market prices — not an official product rating and not a price forecast. Target prices are calculation thresholds, not predictions. Methodology We are not a shop. Affiliate links may earn us a commission; they never change the calculations or the ranking.