Arc A750
The current Arc A750 price from retailers, its key specifications, and how it performs for each job.
Intel · GPU · Arc A
Retailer photo of ASRock Arc A750 Challenger D OC. View this offer in Where to buy
Trade-offs: Not the pick if 4K / VR is your main use
- VRAM
- 8 GB
- Memory bandwidth
- 512 GB/s
- Board power
- 225 W
- Architecture
- Xe-HPG
- Interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Move a slider and the page re-scores this product against the same market frame.
What does it cost today, and is that a good price?
Market confidence: MediumAt $210 the Arc A750 is priced 43% below its $370 representative market level. Only 2 verified new offers stand behind it, so the level can move quickly.
Price looks competitive: the cheapest verified offer is 43% below the current representative level.
Prices & availability
Arc A750: current price and offers
Compare the offers we track for this model, across variants and retailers.
2 tracked offers · 2 retailers
| Variant | Store | Condition | Price (snapshot) | Value · Balanced | Checked | Offer link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASRock Arc A750 Challenger D OC | Newegg | New | $210 | 100 | 2026-11-08 | View offer → |
| SPARKLE Arc A750 TITAN OC | MemoryC | New | $529 | 40 | 2026-11-09 | View offer → |
| Arc A750Multiple variants available | Amazon Affiliate | Varies | Find on Amazon | Not tracked | No price snapshot | Find on Amazon → |
Prices are dated snapshots, not live quotes — confirm the final price at the store. New, refurbished and used offers are listed separately; used offers carry warranty and seller risk.
Performance and where it ranks
Two different questions, side by side. Performance compares what the hardware can do; Value compares what that capability costs at today’s price. A product can rank high on one and low on the other — that gap is the point.
Performance Balanced
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#43 of 54 graded graphics cards
- #40 NVIDIARTX 5050 22
- #41 IntelArc A770 20
- #42 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 20
- #43 IntelArc A750 20
- #44 NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada 20
- #45 AMDRX 7600 19
- #46 AMDRX 6600 XT 19
Value Balanced
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#1 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #1 IntelArc A750 100
- #2 IntelArc B580 84
- #3 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 79
- #4 NVIDIARTX 5060 67
- #5 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 66
- #6 AMDRX 9070 64
- #7 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 63
Performance 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#43 of 54 graded graphics cards
- #40 NVIDIARTX 5050 22
- #41 IntelArc A770 20
- #42 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 20
- #43 IntelArc A750 20
- #44 NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada 20
- #45 AMDRX 7600 19
- #46 AMDRX 6600 XT 19
Value 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#1 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #1 IntelArc A750 100
- #2 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 86
- #3 IntelArc B580 83
- #4 NVIDIARTX 5060 70
- #5 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 69
- #6 AMDRX 9070 65
- #7 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 63
Performance 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#43 of 54 graded graphics cards
- #40 NVIDIARTX 5050 22
- #41 IntelArc A770 20
- #42 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 20
- #43 IntelArc A750 20
- #44 NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada 20
- #45 AMDRX 7600 19
- #46 AMDRX 6600 XT 19
Value 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#1 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #1 IntelArc A750 100
- #2 IntelArc B580 85
- #3 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 77
- #4 NVIDIARTX 5060 67
- #5 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 66
- #6 AMDRX 9070 66
- #7 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 62
Performance 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#43 of 54 graded graphics cards
- #40 NVIDIARTX 5050 22
- #41 IntelArc A770 20
- #42 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 20
- #43 IntelArc A750 20
- #44 NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada 20
- #45 AMDRX 7600 19
- #46 AMDRX 6600 XT 19
Value 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#14 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #11 NVIDIARTX 5080 77
- #12 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 77
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 77
- #14 IntelArc A750 76
- #15 AMDRX 7800 XT 76
- #16 NVIDIARTX 5060 75
- #17 AMDRX 7900 GRE 74
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#33 of 41 graded graphics cards
- #30 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 21
- #31 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 20
- #32 NVIDIARTX 5050 19
- #33 IntelArc A750 14
- #34 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 13
- #35 AMDRX 7600 9
- #36 AMDRX 6600 XT 9
Value Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#19 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 68
- #17 NVIDIARTX 4070 68
- #18 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 68
- #19 IntelArc A750 68
- #20 AMDRX 7900 GRE 67
- #21 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 66
- #22 AMDRX 7800 XT 66
Performance Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#38 of 42 graded graphics cards
- #35 AMDRX 6600 XT 5
- #36 AMDRX 6600 5
- #37 IntelArc A770 4
- #38 IntelArc A750 3
- #39 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 2
- #40 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 2
- #41 AMDRX 6400 1
Value Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#27 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #24 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 53
- #25 NVIDIARTX 3080 10GB 49
- #26 NVIDIARTX 3090 48
- #27 IntelArc A750 45
- #28 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 45
- #29 NVIDIARTX 5050 44
- #30 IntelArc A770 43
Performance AI
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#40 of 52 graded graphics cards
- #37 AMDRX 7700 XT 8
- #38 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 7
- #39 IntelArc A770 7
- #40 IntelArc A750 7
- #41 NVIDIARTX 4060 7
- #42 NVIDIARTX 5050 6
- #43 NVIDIAGTX 1650 5
Value AI
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#20 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #17 AMDRX 9070 GRE 73
- #18 NVIDIARTX 3080 10GB 71
- #19 NVIDIARTX 4000 Ada 71
- #20 IntelArc A750 66
- #21 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 66
- #22 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 65
- #23 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 65
Performance 3D Rendering
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#36 of 41 graded graphics cards
- #33 IntelArc A770 14
- #34 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 14
- #35 NVIDIARTX A2000 14
- #36 IntelArc A750 13
- #37 IntelArc B580 12
- #38 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 11
- #39 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 11
Value 3D Rendering
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#18 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #15 AMDRX 9070 GRE 75
- #16 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 70
- #17 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 70
- #18 IntelArc A750 64
- #19 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 64
- #20 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 63
- #21 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 63
Performance Light Use
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#31 of 52 graded graphics cards
- #28 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 61
- #29 AMDRX 9070 61
- #30 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 61
- #31 IntelArc A750 60
- #32 IntelArc A770 60
- #33 AMDRX 7700 XT 55
- #34 NVIDIARTX 5070 54
Value Light Use
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#5 of 56 currently priced graphics cards
- #2 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 100
- #3 AMDRX 6400 63
- #4 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 57
- #5 IntelArc A750 43
- #6 IntelArc B580 32
- #7 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 30
- #8 NVIDIARTX 5060 30
These ladders follow the preset scenario shown above. Your own weights re-score this product, not the whole field.
What it is good for
| Scenario | this productCapability grade · Value at current price | Higher capability | Higher Value with current priorities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced (all-round)Weighted all-round view | GradeNo grade Value100 | — | — |
| 1080p GamingRaster performance · 1080p | GradeB Value100 | — | — |
| 1440p GamingRaster performance · 1440p | GradeC Value100 | — | — |
| 4K / VRRaster performance · 4K / VR | GradeF Value76 | — | — |
| Ray Tracing @ 1440pRay tracing capability · 1440p | GradeF Value68 | — | — |
| Ray Tracing @ 4KRay tracing capability · 4K | GradeF Value45 | — | — |
| AI / Local LLMAI compute · memory and ecosystem fit | GradeC Value66 | — | — |
| 3D Rendering3D rendering · creator workloads | GradeD Value64 | — | — |
| Light Use & EfficiencyEfficiency · lighter workloads | GradeC Value43 | Higher capability RTX 3050 6GB S 100 +61% capability · +19% price | Higher Value with current priorities Arc A380 S 100 +59% capability · -10% price |
Balanced has no letter: it is a weighting preset, not a capability rubric. A grade answers “how well does this handle that job?” — price is never part of it. Relative Value puts the current market price back in.
Compare these grades with the full tier list
Browse shortlists for different uses
Trade-offs
Works well if
- 1080p Gaming is your main prioritygraded B for 1080p Gaming on the same rubric as the tier list
- Today's price already clears the strong-value markcheapest tracked $210 against a $262 threshold with Balanced priorities
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 4K / VR is your main useit grades only F there
Works well if
- 1080p is your main priority — B here means solid 60 fps at high settingsgraded B for 1080p on the same rubric as the tier list
- Today's price already clears the strong-value markcheapest tracked $210 against a $262 threshold for 1080p
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade for 1080p — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 4K / VR is your main useit grades only F there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 1440p is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for 1440p, but B for 1080p Gaming
- Today's price already clears the strong-value markcheapest tracked $210 against a $262 threshold for 1440p
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 1440p is your main useit grades only C there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 4K is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades F for 4K, but B for 1080p Gaming
- Strong-value threshold: ~$191$191 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for 4K, in the 2026-11-02–2026-11-09 offer frame
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 4K is your main useit grades only F there
- Current price sits $19 above the strong-value threshold (~$191)cheapest tracked $210 against a $191 calculated threshold for 4K
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1440p is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades F for Ray Tracing @ 1440p, but B for 1080p Gaming
- Strong-value threshold: ~$151$151 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for Ray Tracing @ 1440p, in the 2026-11-02–2026-11-09 offer frame
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 1440p is your main useit grades only F there
- Current price sits $59 above the strong-value threshold (~$151)cheapest tracked $210 against a $151 calculated threshold for Ray Tracing @ 1440p
- You are buying for Ray Tracing @ 1440p and want no asterisksthe rubric caps this grade: fps estimated (low confidence), not measured
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 4K is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades F for Ray Tracing @ 4K, but B for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 4K is your main useit grades only F there
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 4K specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for Ray Tracing @ 4K per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- You are buying for Ray Tracing @ 4K and want no asterisksthe rubric caps this grade: fps estimated (low confidence), not measured
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- AI is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for AI, but B for 1080p Gaming
- Strong-value threshold: ~$145$145 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for AI, in the 2026-11-02–2026-11-09 offer frame
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if AI is your main useit grades only C there
- Current price sits $65 above the strong-value threshold (~$145)cheapest tracked $210 against a $145 calculated threshold for AI
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 3D Rendering is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades D for 3D Rendering, but B for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 3D Rendering is your main useit grades only D there
- You want strong value for 3D Rendering specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for 3D Rendering — the calculation only gets there near $136, against a cheapest tracked $210
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Light Use is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for Light Use, but B for 1080p Gaming
- Strong-value threshold: ~$139$139 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for Light Use, in the 2026-11-02–2026-11-09 offer frame
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Light Use is your main useit grades C there; RTX 3050 6GB grades S at $250
- Current price sits $71 above the strong-value threshold (~$139)cheapest tracked $210 against a $139 calculated threshold for Light Use
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelArc A380 holds Relative Value 100 against its 43 for Light Use, at $190
Every line states the fact it was derived from, for the scenario selected above. Thresholds are calculated points on our value curve — information about where the maths turns, not instructions about what to pay.
Similar options to the Arc A750
Chosen for Light Use
More head-to-head comparisons in this category
Upgrade planner
Judge the change in the active scenario, then make the cash gap explicit.
Using page scenarioWhat are you upgrading from? These are the axes we compare on, and where this product stands in the current market.
We rank upgrades by out-of-pocket cost — the new price minus what yours is worth — not by sticker price.
Only candidates that clear the configured meaningful-upgrade gate will be shown; roles are omitted rather than filled.
Capability differences are expressed as tiers and index points, not as benchmark percentages we did not measure.
Specifications and compatibility
What this product is, and what to check before it goes into your build.
Core / Performance
- Architecture
- Xe-HPG
- GPU chip
- DG2-512
- GPU variant
- ACM-G10
- Process node
- 6 nm
- Transistors
- 21,700 million
- Shading units
- 3584
Memory
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 225 W
- Power connector
- Varies by version
- Recommended PSU
- Varies by version
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Varies by version271–306 mm across tracked variants
- Height
- Varies by version103–132 mm across tracked variants
- Width
- Varies by version
- Slot thickness
- Varies by version2–3 across tracked variants
- Fans
- Varies by version2–3 across tracked variants
- Cooling
- Varies by version
- Outputs
- Varies by version
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 225 W
- Power connector
- 2x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 550 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 271 mm
- Height
- 132 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- A750 CLD 8GO
- Vendor warranty
- 2 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 225 W
- Power connector
- 2x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 550 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 306 mm
- Height
- 103 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- SA750T-8GOC
- Vendor warranty
- 2 years
Select an exact version for physical dimensions and connector details.
Show all specifications
Core / Performance
- Texture units
- 224
- ROPs
- 112
- Ray tracing cores
- 28
- Tensor cores
- 0
- Base clock
- 2200 MHz
- Boost clock
- 2400 MHz
Features
- Upscaling
- XeSS
- Ray tracing
- Supported
- RGB lighting
- No
Warranty & release
- Release year
- 2022
Hover any value to see where it came from: a manufacturer specification, or a figure The Comparator calculated.
Sources: Comparator offer frame 2026-11-02–2026-11-09
What to check in your build
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Select a board to confirm its connector and cable-clearance needs.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Slot occupancy depends on the board cooler and thickness.
Select an exact version above for physical dimensions and connector details.
550 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
2x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 271 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
550 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
2x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 306 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
Compare all 2 board variants
| Variant | Length | Slot thickness | Power connector | Recommended PSU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASRock Arc A750 Challenger D OC | 271 mm | 2 | 2x 8-pin | 550 W |
| SPARKLE Arc A750 TITAN OC | 306 mm | 3 | 2x 8-pin | 550 W |
Found an error? Report this specification Email the field, corrected value and an optional source.
Compatibility guidance is practical help, not a score. Missing data is shown as unknown, never invented.
Summary
Arc A750 offers a balanced view across an all-round mix of priorities. It ranks #43 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 520. The main limitation appears when 4K / VR becomes the priority, where it grades F.
Arc A750 offers B-grade capability for 1080p. It ranks #43 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 520. The main limitation appears when 4K / VR becomes the priority, where it grades F.
Arc A750 offers C-grade capability for 1440p. It ranks #43 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 520. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
Arc A750 offers F-grade capability for 4K. It ranks #43 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 520. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
Arc A750 offers F-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1440p. It ranks #33 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 446. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
Arc A750 offers F-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 4K. It ranks #38 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 446. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
Arc A750 offers C-grade capability for AI. It ranks #40 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ai compute index 260. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
Arc A750 offers D-grade capability for 3D Rendering. It ranks #36 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 520. The D grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
Arc A750 offers C-grade capability for Light Use. It ranks #31 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 520. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
FAQ
Do all Arc A750 boards have the same physical design?
No. Dimensions, slot thickness, cooling, power connectors and display outputs belong to the exact board. Use the Exact version selector before checking case or PSU fit.
How much case clearance should I allow for the Arc A750?
Tracked boards range from 271 to 306 mm in length. Select the exact board, then also allow for front radiators or fans, card height, slot thickness and power-cable bend; length alone does not guarantee fit.
Why does Relative Value change when I choose another scenario?
Each scenario changes the weights applied to capability, price and the other published factors. The hardware facts stay fixed, but the value question changes, so its score and rank can change too.
Why can Amazon appear without a tracked price?
Amazon listing snapshots can participate in Value while fresh. We show Check on Amazon instead of its price; confirm the current price and availability at the store. When no current listing snapshot exists, Amazon is a search link only.
Useful links & sources
offer frame 2026-11-02–2026-11-09 · formula gpu-value-v6.1 · facts facts-2026-11-09 · Relative Value is an estimate from our current dataset, the selected weights and dated market prices — not an official product rating and not a price forecast. Target prices are calculation thresholds, not predictions. Methodology We are not a shop. Affiliate links may earn us a commission; they never change the calculations or the ranking.