RX 9060 XT 16GB
The current RX 9060 XT 16GB price from retailers, its key specifications, and how it performs for each job.
AMD · GPU · RX 9000
Retailer photo of Sapphire PURE RX 9060 XT OC 16 GB. View this offer in Where to buy
Works well for: 1080p Gaming, 1440p Gaming
Trade-offs: Current price sits CAD 246 above the strong-value threshold (~CAD 914)
- Memory bandwidth
- 322 GB/s
- Board power
- 170 W
- Architecture
- RDNA 4.0
- Interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Move a slider and the page re-scores this product against the same market frame.
What does it cost today, and is that a good price?
Market confidence: MediumAt CAD 1160 the RX 9060 XT 16GB is priced 7% below its CAD 1250 representative market level. Only one retailer currently backs that price, so the level is a single data point rather than a market.
Limited market: only one retailer currently has a verified offer, so treat this price as a single data point.
Prices & availability
RX 9060 XT 16GB: current price and offers
Compare the offers we track for this model, across variants and retailers.
4 tracked offers · 1 retailers
| Variant | Store | Condition | Price (snapshot) | Value · Balanced | Checked | Offer link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sapphire PURE RX 9060 XT OC 16 GB | Newegg | New | CAD 1,160 | 63 | 2026-11-09 | View offer → |
| Sapphire NITRO+ RX 9060 XT OC 16 GB | Newegg | New | CAD 1,250 | 58 | 2026-11-09 | View offer → |
| GIGABYTE RX 9060 XT GAMING 16 GB | Newegg | New | CAD 1,300 | 57 | 2026-11-08 | View offer → |
| RX 9060 XT 16GBMultiple variants available | Amazon Affiliate | Varies | Find on Amazon | Not tracked | No price snapshot | Find on Amazon → |
Prices are dated snapshots, not live quotes — confirm the final price at the store. New, refurbished and used offers are listed separately; used offers carry warranty and seller risk.
Show the other 1 tracked offers
| Variant | Store | Condition | Price (snapshot) | Value · Balanced | Checked | Offer link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sapphire PULSE RX 9060 XT OC 16 GB | Newegg | Refurbished | CAD 630 | 87 | 2026-11-08 | View offer → |
Performance and where it ranks
Two different questions, side by side. Performance compares what the hardware can do; Value compares what that capability costs at today’s price. A product can rank high on one and low on the other — that gap is the point.
Performance Balanced
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#22 of 41 graded graphics cards
- #19 AMDRX 7800 XT 43
- #20 NVIDIARTX 4070 42
- #21 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 42
- #22 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 40
- #23 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 40
- #24 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 36
- #25 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 36
Value Balanced
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#15 of 42 currently priced graphics cards
- #12 NVIDIAGTX 1650 70
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4070 68
- #14 AMDRX 7800 XT 66
- #15 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 63
- #16 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 62
- #17 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 60
- #18 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 59
Performance 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#22 of 41 graded graphics cards
- #19 AMDRX 7800 XT 43
- #20 NVIDIARTX 4070 42
- #21 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 42
- #22 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 40
- #23 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 40
- #24 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 36
- #25 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 36
Value 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#15 of 42 currently priced graphics cards
- #12 NVIDIAGTX 1650 69
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4070 66
- #14 AMDRX 7800 XT 64
- #15 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 61
- #16 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 59
- #17 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 59
- #18 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 58
Performance 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#22 of 41 graded graphics cards
- #19 AMDRX 7800 XT 43
- #20 NVIDIARTX 4070 42
- #21 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 42
- #22 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 40
- #23 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 40
- #24 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 36
- #25 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 36
Value 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#15 of 42 currently priced graphics cards
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4070 68
- #13 AMDRX 7800 XT 66
- #14 NVIDIAGTX 1650 64
- #15 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 63
- #16 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 63
- #17 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 61
- #18 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 61
Performance 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#22 of 41 graded graphics cards
- #19 AMDRX 7800 XT 43
- #20 NVIDIARTX 4070 42
- #21 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 42
- #22 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 40
- #23 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 40
- #24 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 36
- #25 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 36
Value 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#15 of 42 currently priced graphics cards
- #12 AMDRX 7800 XT 73
- #13 NVIDIARTX 5090 73
- #14 NVIDIARTX 4070 72
- #15 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 71
- #16 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 71
- #17 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 70
- #18 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 69
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#22 of 36 graded graphics cards
- #19 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 45
- #20 AMDRX 7800 XT 39
- #21 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 37
- #22 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 36
- #23 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 33
- #24 AMDRX 7700 XT 33
- #25 NVIDIARTX 5060 33
Value Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#19 of 42 currently priced graphics cards
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4080 69
- #17 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 69
- #18 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 64
- #19 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 63
- #20 AMDRX 7800 XT 63
- #21 AMDRX 7900 GRE 62
- #22 NVIDIARTX 5050 60
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#21 of 36 graded graphics cards
- #18 AMDRX 9070 GRE 37
- #19 AMDRX 7900 GRE 34
- #20 AMDRX 7800 XT 33
- #21 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 31
- #22 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 27
- #23 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 26
- #24 AMDRX 7700 XT 25
Value Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#19 of 42 currently priced graphics cards
- #16 NVIDIARTX 5060 68
- #17 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 68
- #18 AMDRX 7800 XT 63
- #19 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 63
- #20 AMDRX 7900 GRE 62
- #21 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 61
- #22 AMDRX 7900 XT 57
Performance Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#21 of 36 graded graphics cards
- #18 AMDRX 7900 GRE 27
- #19 AMDRX 9070 GRE 24
- #20 AMDRX 7800 XT 24
- #21 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 23
- #22 AMDRX 7700 XT 15
- #23 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 15
- #24 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 14
Value Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#18 of 42 currently priced graphics cards
- #15 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 63
- #16 AMDRX 7900 XT 62
- #17 NVIDIARTX 4070 61
- #18 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 60
- #19 AMDRX 7900 GRE 60
- #20 AMDRX 7800 XT 59
- #21 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 57
Performance AI
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#22 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #19 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 15
- #20 AMDRX 7900 XTX 15
- #21 AMDRX 7900 XT 12
- #22 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 12
- #23 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 12
- #24 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 12
- #25 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 11
Value AI
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#15 of 42 currently priced graphics cards
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 72
- #13 AMDRX 9070 GRE 70
- #14 AMDRX 9070 70
- #15 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 55
- #16 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 54
- #17 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 54
- #18 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 51
Performance 3D Rendering
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#35 of 38 graded graphics cards
- #32 NVIDIARTX A2000 14
- #33 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 11
- #34 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 11
- #35 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 11
- #36 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 11
- #37 AMDRX 6700 XT 10
- #38 AMDRX 7600 8
Value 3D Rendering
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#17 of 42 currently priced graphics cards
- #14 AMDRX 9070 69
- #15 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 54
- #16 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 51
- #17 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 51
- #18 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 49
- #19 NVIDIARTX 5060 47
- #20 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 46
Performance Light Use
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#14 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 78
- #12 AMDRX 6600 XT 78
- #13 AMDRX 7600 77
- #14 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 76
- #15 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 76
- #16 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 73
- #17 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 73
Value Light Use
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#14 of 42 currently priced graphics cards
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4060 15
- #12 AMDRX 9070 13
- #13 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 13
- #14 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 12
- #15 NVIDIARTX A2000 12
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 11
- #17 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 11
These ladders follow the preset scenario shown above. Your own weights re-score this product, not the whole field.
What it is good for
| Scenario | this productCapability grade · Value at current price | Higher capability | Higher Value with current priorities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced (all-round)Weighted all-round view | GradeNo grade Value63 | Higher capability RX 9070 XT 87 +49% capability · -5% price | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 GRE 100 +8% capability · -35% price |
| 1080p GamingRaster performance · 1080p | GradeA Value61 | Higher capability RX 9070 XT S 86 +49% capability · -5% price | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 GRE S 100 +8% capability · -35% price |
| 1440p GamingRaster performance · 1440p | GradeA Value63 | Higher capability RX 9070 XT S 89 +49% capability · -5% price | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 GRE A 100 +8% capability · -35% price |
| 4K / VRRaster performance · 4K / VR | GradeC Value71 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT A 100 +49% capability · -5% price | |
| Ray Tracing @ 1080pRay tracing capability · 1080p | GradeB Value63 | Higher capability RTX 4070 Ti Super A 85 +94% capability · +11% price | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT A 100 +72% capability · -5% price |
| Ray Tracing @ 1440pRay tracing capability · 1440p | GradeC Value63 | Higher capability RTX 4070 Ti Super A 85 +94% capability · +11% price | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT B 100 +79% capability · -5% price |
| Ray Tracing @ 4KRay tracing capability · 4K | GradeF Value60 | Higher capability RTX 4070 Ti Super C 79 +116% capability · +11% price | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT C 88 +102% capability · -5% price |
| AI / Local LLMAI compute · memory and ecosystem fit | GradeB Value55 | Higher capability RTX 4070 Ti Super A 93 +245% capability · +11% price | Higher Value with current priorities RTX 4070 Super B 83 +177% capability · -12% price |
| 3D Rendering3D rendering · creator workloads | GradeD Value51 | Higher capability RTX 4070 Ti Super A 93 +329% capability · +11% price | Higher Value with current priorities RTX 4070 Super B 85 +270% capability · -12% price |
| Light Use & EfficiencyEfficiency · lighter workloads | GradeB Value12 | Higher capability RTX 3050 6GB S 49 +32% capability · -48% price | Higher Value with current priorities GTX 1650 B 100 +31% capability · -82% price |
Balanced has no letter: it is a weighting preset, not a capability rubric. A grade answers “how well does this handle that job?” — price is never part of it. Relative Value puts the current market price back in.
Compare these grades with the full tier list
Browse shortlists for different uses
Trade-offs
Works well if
- 1080p Gaming is your main prioritygraded A for 1080p Gaming on the same rubric as the tier list
- Strong-value threshold: ~CAD 914CAD 914 is where Relative Value reaches 80 with Balanced priorities, in the 2026-11-06–2026-11-09 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
Consider other options if
- Current price sits CAD 246 above the strong-value threshold (~CAD 914)cheapest tracked CAD 1160 against a CAD 914 calculated threshold with Balanced priorities
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 GRE holds Relative Value 100 against its 63 with Balanced priorities, at CAD 750
- Not the pick if 3D Rendering is your main useit grades only D there
Works well if
- 1080p is your main priority — A here means confident 90–120 fps at high settingsgraded A for 1080p on the same rubric as the tier list
- Strong-value threshold: ~CAD 892CAD 892 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for 1080p, in the 2026-11-06–2026-11-09 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade for 1080p — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
Consider other options if
- Current price sits CAD 268 above the strong-value threshold (~CAD 892)cheapest tracked CAD 1160 against a CAD 892 calculated threshold for 1080p
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 GRE holds Relative Value 100 against its 61 for 1080p, at CAD 750
- Not the pick if 3D Rendering is your main useit grades only D there
Works well if
- 1440p is your main priority — A here means confident 90–130 fps at high settings, 12 GB+ VRAMgraded A for 1440p on the same rubric as the tier list
- Strong-value threshold: ~CAD 908CAD 908 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for 1440p, in the 2026-11-06–2026-11-09 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — 16 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 10 GB grades B for 1440p; this one has 16 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Current price sits CAD 252 above the strong-value threshold (~CAD 908)cheapest tracked CAD 1160 against a CAD 908 calculated threshold for 1440p
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 GRE holds Relative Value 100 against its 63 for 1440p, at CAD 750
- Not the pick if 3D Rendering is your main useit grades only D there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 4K is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for 4K, but A for 1080p Gaming
- Strong-value threshold: ~CAD 924CAD 924 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for 4K, in the 2026-11-06–2026-11-09 offer frame
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 4K is your main useit grades C there; RX 9070 XT grades A at CAD 1100
- Current price sits CAD 236 above the strong-value threshold (~CAD 924)cheapest tracked CAD 1160 against a CAD 924 calculated threshold for 4K
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 100 against its 71 for 4K, at CAD 1100
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1080p is your main priority — B here means playablegraded B for Ray Tracing @ 1080p on the same rubric as the tier list, from 45 fps measured natively (upscaling typically adds 40–60% on top)
- You want memory headroom — 16 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 8 GB grades D for Ray Tracing @ 1080p; this one has 16 GB and hits no memory cap
- FSR 4 with frame generation matters to youML upscaler + frame generation — derived from the rdna4 architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 1080p specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for Ray Tracing @ 1080p — the calculation only gets there near CAD 730, against a cheapest tracked CAD 1160
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 100 against its 63 for Ray Tracing @ 1080p, at CAD 1100
- Not the pick if 3D Rendering is your main useit grades only D there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1440p is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for Ray Tracing @ 1440p, but A for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 1440p is your main useit grades C there; RTX 4070 Ti Super grades A at CAD 1283
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 1440p specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for Ray Tracing @ 1440p — the calculation only gets there near CAD 724, against a cheapest tracked CAD 1160
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 100 against its 63 for Ray Tracing @ 1440p, at CAD 1100
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 4K is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades F for Ray Tracing @ 4K, but A for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 4K is your main useit grades F there; RTX 4070 Ti Super grades C at CAD 1283
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 4K specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for Ray Tracing @ 4K — the calculation only gets there near CAD 384, against a cheapest tracked CAD 1160
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 88 against its 60 for Ray Tracing @ 4K, at CAD 1100
Works well if
- AI is your main prioritygraded B for AI on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — 16 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 10 GB grades C for AI; this one has 16 GB and hits no memory cap
- FSR 4 with frame generation matters to youML upscaler + frame generation — derived from the rdna4 architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for AI specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for AI — the calculation only gets there near CAD 539, against a cheapest tracked CAD 1160
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRTX 4070 Super holds Relative Value 83 against its 55 for AI, at CAD 1026
- Not the pick if 3D Rendering is your main useit grades only D there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 3D Rendering is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades D for 3D Rendering, but A for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 3D Rendering is your main useit grades D there; RTX 4070 Ti Super grades A at CAD 1283
- You want strong value for 3D Rendering specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for 3D Rendering — the calculation only gets there near CAD 463, against a cheapest tracked CAD 1160
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRTX 4070 Super holds Relative Value 85 against its 51 for 3D Rendering, at CAD 1026
Works well if
- Light Use is your main prioritygraded B for Light Use on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade for Light Use — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
- FSR 4 with frame generation matters to youML upscaler + frame generation — derived from the rdna4 architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for Light Use specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for Light Use — the calculation only gets there near CAD 333, against a cheapest tracked CAD 1160
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelGTX 1650 holds Relative Value 100 against its 12 for Light Use, at CAD 210
- Not the pick if 3D Rendering is your main useit grades only D there
Every line states the fact it was derived from, for the scenario selected above. Thresholds are calculated points on our value curve — information about where the maths turns, not instructions about what to pay.
Similar options to the RX 9060 XT 16GB
Chosen for Balanced
Chosen for 1080p
Chosen for 1440p
Chosen for 4K
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1080p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1440p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 4K
Chosen for AI
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: CUDA — Many local-LLM and diffusion toolchains are CUDA-only. ROCm and Vulkan builds exist and work, but they are not drop-in — check your toolchain before treating a non-NVIDIA card as an equivalent swap.
Chosen for 3D Rendering
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: OptiX — Blender Cycles reaches its fastest path on NVIDIA OptiX. HIP (AMD) and oneAPI (Intel) render the same scenes, so this is a workflow question, not a capability wall — but render times and add-on support differ.
Chosen for Light Use
Alternatives stay near this product’s price range. Step-up options may exceed the standard budget envelope when the capability gain is meaningful.
More head-to-head comparisons in this category
Upgrade planner
Judge the change in the active scenario, then make the cash gap explicit.
Using page scenarioWhat are you upgrading from? These are the axes we compare on, and where this product stands in the current market.
We rank upgrades by out-of-pocket cost — the new price minus what yours is worth — not by sticker price.
Only candidates that clear the configured meaningful-upgrade gate will be shown; roles are omitted rather than filled.
Capability differences are expressed as tiers and index points, not as benchmark percentages we did not measure.
Specifications and compatibility
What this product is, and what to check before it goes into your build.
Core / Performance
- Architecture
- RDNA 4.0
- GPU chip
- Navi 44
- GPU variant
- Navi 44 XT (215-176400102)
- Process node
- 4 nm
- Transistors
- 29,700 million
- Shading units
- 2048
Memory
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 170 W
- Power connector
- Varies by version
- Recommended PSU
- Varies by version
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Varies by version240–300 mm across tracked variants
- Height
- Varies by version118–131 mm across tracked variants
- Width
- Varies by version
- Slot thickness
- Varies by version2–3 across tracked variants
- Fans
- Varies by version3 across tracked variants
- Cooling
- Varies by version
- Outputs
- Varies by version
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 170 W
- Power connector
- 1x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 450 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 281 mm
- Height
- 118 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 2× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-R9060XTGAMING-16GD
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 170 W
- Power connector
- 1x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 450 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 300 mm
- Height
- 131 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 1× DisplayPort · 2× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- 11350-01-20G
- Vendor warranty
- 2 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 170 W
- Power connector
- 1x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 450 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 240 mm
- Height
- 124 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 1× DisplayPort · 2× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- 11350-03-20G
- Vendor warranty
- 3 months
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 170 W
- Power connector
- 1x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 450 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 240 mm
- Height
- 124 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 1× DisplayPort · 2× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- 11350-02-20G
- Vendor warranty
- 2 years
Select an exact version for physical dimensions and connector details.
Show all specifications
Core / Performance
- Texture units
- 128
- ROPs
- 64
- Ray tracing cores
- 32
- Tensor cores
- 0
- Base clock
- 1700 MHz
- Boost clock
- 3290 MHz
Features
- Upscaling
- FSR 4
- Frame generation
- frame generation
- Ray tracing
- Supported
- RGB lighting
- No
Warranty & release
- Release year
- 2025
Hover any value to see where it came from: a manufacturer specification, or a figure The Comparator calculated.
Sources: Comparator offer frame 2026-11-06–2026-11-09
What to check in your build
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Select a board to confirm its connector and cable-clearance needs.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Slot occupancy depends on the board cooler and thickness.
Select an exact version above for physical dimensions and connector details.
450 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 281 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
450 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 300 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
450 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 240 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
450 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 240 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
Compare all 4 board variants
| Variant | Length | Slot thickness | Power connector | Recommended PSU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GIGABYTE RX 9060 XT GAMING 16 GB | 281 mm | 2 | 1x 8-pin | 450 W |
| Sapphire NITRO+ RX 9060 XT OC 16 GB | 300 mm | 3 | 1x 8-pin | 450 W |
| Sapphire PULSE RX 9060 XT OC 16 GB | 240 mm | 2 | 1x 8-pin | 450 W |
| Sapphire PURE RX 9060 XT OC 16 GB | 240 mm | 2 | 1x 8-pin | 450 W |
Found an error? Report this specification Email the field, corrected value and an optional source.
Compatibility guidance is practical help, not a score. Missing data is shown as unknown, never invented.
Summary
RX 9060 XT 16GB offers a balanced view across an all-round mix of priorities. It ranks #22 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 950. RX 9070 GRE currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RX 9060 XT 16GB offers A-grade capability for 1080p. It ranks #22 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 950. RX 9070 GRE currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RX 9060 XT 16GB offers A-grade capability for 1440p. It ranks #22 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 950. RX 9070 GRE currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RX 9060 XT 16GB offers C-grade capability for 4K. It ranks #22 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 950. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 9060 XT 16GB offers B-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1080p. It ranks #22 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 792. RX 9070 GRE currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RX 9060 XT 16GB offers C-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1440p. It ranks #21 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 792. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 9060 XT 16GB offers F-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 4K. It ranks #21 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 792. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 9060 XT 16GB offers B-grade capability for AI. It ranks #22 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ai compute index 439. RX 9070 GRE currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RX 9060 XT 16GB offers D-grade capability for 3D Rendering. It ranks #35 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 950. The D grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 9060 XT 16GB offers B-grade capability for Light Use. It ranks #14 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 950. RX 9060 XT 8GB currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
FAQ
Do all RX 9060 XT 16GB boards have the same physical design?
No. Dimensions, slot thickness, cooling, power connectors and display outputs belong to the exact board. Use the Exact version selector before checking case or PSU fit.
How much case clearance should I allow for the RX 9060 XT 16GB?
Tracked boards range from 240 to 300 mm in length. Select the exact board, then also allow for front radiators or fans, card height, slot thickness and power-cable bend; length alone does not guarantee fit.
Why does Relative Value change when I choose another scenario?
Each scenario changes the weights applied to capability, price and the other published factors. The hardware facts stay fixed, but the value question changes, so its score and rank can change too.
Why can Amazon appear without a tracked price?
Amazon listing snapshots can participate in Value while fresh. We show Check on Amazon instead of its price; confirm the current price and availability at the store. When no current listing snapshot exists, Amazon is a search link only.
Useful links & sources
offer frame 2026-11-06–2026-11-09 · formula gpu-value-v6.1 · facts facts-2026-11-09 · Relative Value is an estimate from our current dataset, the selected weights and dated market prices — not an official product rating and not a price forecast. Target prices are calculation thresholds, not predictions. Methodology We are not a shop. Affiliate links may earn us a commission; they never change the calculations or the ranking.