RX 6500 XT 4GB
The current RX 6500 XT 4GB price from retailers, its key specifications, and how it performs for each job.
AMD · GPU · RX 6000
Retailer photo of ASUS DUAL RX 6500 XT OC. View this offer in Where to buy
Works well for: Light Use & Efficiency
Trade-offs: you want strong value with Balanced priorities specifically
- VRAM
- 4 GB
- Memory bandwidth
- 144 GB/s
- Board power
- 107 W
- Architecture
- RDNA 2.0
- Interface
- PCIe 4.0 x4
Move a slider and the page re-scores this product against the same market frame.
What does it cost today, and is that a good price?
Market confidence: MediumAt CAD 450 the RX 6500 XT 4GB is priced in line with its CAD 460 representative market level. Only one retailer currently backs that price, so the level is a single data point rather than a market.
Limited market: only one retailer currently has a verified offer, so treat this price as a single data point.
Prices & availability
RX 6500 XT 4GB: current price and offers
Compare the offers we track for this model, across variants and retailers.
3 tracked offers · 1 retailers
| Variant | Store | Condition | Price (snapshot) | Value · Balanced | Checked | Offer link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS DUAL RX 6500 XT OC | Newegg | New | CAD 450 | 38 | 2026-11-09 | View offer → |
| GIGABYTE RX 6500 XT EAGLE | Newegg | New | CAD 460 | 37 | 2026-11-09 | View offer → |
| Sapphire PULSE RX 6500 XT | Newegg | New | CAD 500 | 34 | 2026-11-09 | View offer → |
| RX 6500 XT 4GBMultiple variants available | Amazon Affiliate | Varies | Find on Amazon | Not tracked | No price snapshot | Find on Amazon → |
Prices are dated snapshots, not live quotes — confirm the final price at the store. New, refurbished and used offers are listed separately; used offers carry warranty and seller risk.
Performance and where it ranks
Two different questions, side by side. Performance compares what the hardware can do; Value compares what that capability costs at today’s price. A product can rank high on one and low on the other — that gap is the point.
Performance Balanced
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#40 of 41 graded graphics cards
- #35 AMDRX 7600 21
- #36 AMDRX 6600 XT 20
- #37 NVIDIARTX A2000 19
- #38 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 15
- #39 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 15
- #40 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 8
- #41 NVIDIAGTX 1650 8
Value Balanced
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#32 of 42 currently priced graphics cards
- #29 AMDRX 7900 XT 43
- #30 NVIDIARTX 4080 43
- #31 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 41
- #32 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 38
- #33 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 37
- #34 AMDRX 7900 XTX 34
- #35 AMDRX 6700 XT 30
Performance 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#40 of 41 graded graphics cards
- #35 AMDRX 7600 21
- #36 AMDRX 6600 XT 20
- #37 NVIDIARTX A2000 19
- #38 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 15
- #39 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 15
- #40 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 8
- #41 NVIDIAGTX 1650 8
Value 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#33 of 42 currently priced graphics cards
- #30 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 42
- #31 NVIDIARTX 4080 41
- #32 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 40
- #33 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 36
- #34 AMDRX 7900 XTX 33
- #35 AMDRX 6700 XT 29
- #36 NVIDIARTX 5090 24
Performance 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#40 of 41 graded graphics cards
- #35 AMDRX 7600 21
- #36 AMDRX 6600 XT 20
- #37 NVIDIARTX A2000 19
- #38 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 15
- #39 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 15
- #40 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 8
- #41 NVIDIAGTX 1650 8
Value 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#32 of 42 currently priced graphics cards
- #29 NVIDIARTX 4080 44
- #30 AMDRX 7900 XT 44
- #31 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 41
- #32 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 36
- #33 AMDRX 7900 XTX 35
- #34 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 32
- #35 AMDRX 6700 XT 31
Performance 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#40 of 41 graded graphics cards
- #35 AMDRX 7600 21
- #36 AMDRX 6600 XT 20
- #37 NVIDIARTX A2000 19
- #38 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 15
- #39 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 15
- #40 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 8
- #41 NVIDIAGTX 1650 8
Value 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#39 of 42 currently priced graphics cards
- #36 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 31
- #37 NVIDIAGTX 1650 28
- #38 AMDRX 6600 XT 26
- #39 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 24
- #40 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 20
- #41 NVIDIARTX A2000 16
- #42 NVIDIARTX PRO 4500 Blackwell 6
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#36 of 36 graded graphics cards
- #30 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 24
- #31 AMDRX 6700 XT 22
- #32 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 16
- #33 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 16
- #34 AMDRX 6600 XT 14
- #35 AMDRX 7600 13
- #36 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 6
Value Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#35 of 42 currently priced graphics cards
- #32 AMDRX 6700 XT 34
- #33 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 34
- #34 NVIDIARTX 3090 32
- #35 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 21
- #36 AMDRX 6600 XT 21
- #37 NVIDIAGTX 1650 18
- #38 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 10
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#36 of 36 graded graphics cards
- #30 NVIDIARTX 5050 19
- #31 AMDRX 6700 XT 18
- #32 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 13
- #33 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 13
- #34 AMDRX 7600 9
- #35 AMDRX 6600 XT 9
- #36 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 4
Value Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#36 of 42 currently priced graphics cards
- #33 NVIDIARTX 3090 33
- #34 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 31
- #35 AMDRX 6600 XT 20
- #36 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 20
- #37 NVIDIAGTX 1650 17
- #38 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 11
- #39 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 7
Performance Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#36 of 36 graded graphics cards
- #30 NVIDIARTX 4060 11
- #31 NVIDIARTX 5050 10
- #32 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 7
- #33 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 7
- #34 AMDRX 7600 6
- #35 AMDRX 6600 XT 5
- #36 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 2
Value Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#36 of 42 currently priced graphics cards
- #33 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 30
- #34 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 26
- #35 AMDRX 6600 XT 22
- #36 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 15
- #37 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 13
- #38 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 12
- #39 NVIDIAGTX 1650 12
Performance AI
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#40 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #34 NVIDIARTX 5050 6
- #35 NVIDIAGTX 1650 6
- #36 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 5
- #37 AMDRX 7600 5
- #38 AMDRX 6700 XT 3
- #39 AMDRX 6600 XT 3
- #40 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 1
Value AI
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#40 of 42 currently priced graphics cards
- #36 NVIDIARTX PRO 4500 Blackwell 33
- #37 NVIDIARTX 4060 31
- #38 AMDRX 6700 XT 18
- #39 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 17
- #40 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 14
- #41 AMDRX 6600 XT 13
- #42 NVIDIARTX A2000 6
Performance Light Use
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#4 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #1 NVIDIARTX A2000 100
- #2 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 100
- #3 NVIDIAGTX 1650 99
- #4 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 91
- #5 NVIDIARTX 4060 89
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5050 85
- #7 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 85
Value Light Use
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#3 of 42 currently priced graphics cards
- #1 NVIDIAGTX 1650 100
- #2 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 49
- #3 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 36
- #4 NVIDIARTX 5050 35
- #5 AMDRX 7600 34
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5060 30
- #7 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 27
These ladders follow the preset scenario shown above. Your own weights re-score this product, not the whole field.
What it is good for
| Scenario | this productCapability grade · Value at current price | Higher capability | Higher Value with current priorities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced (all-round)Weighted all-round view | GradeNo grade Value38 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 7600 79 +145% capability · +3% price | |
| 1080p GamingRaster performance · 1080p | GradeD Value36 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 7600 B 79 +145% capability · +3% price | |
| 1440p GamingRaster performance · 1440p | GradeF Value36 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 7600 C 76 +145% capability · +3% price | |
| 4K / VRRaster performance · 4K / VR | GradeF Value24 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 7600 F 52 +145% capability · +3% price | |
| Ray Tracing @ 1080pRay tracing capability · 1080p | GradeF Value21 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 7600 F 39 +98% capability · +3% price | |
| Ray Tracing @ 1440pRay tracing capability · 1440p | GradeF Value20 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 7600 F 38 +116% capability · +3% price | |
| Ray Tracing @ 4KRay tracing capability · 4K | GradeF Value15 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 7600 F 30 +215% capability · +3% price | |
| AI / Local LLMAI compute · memory and ecosystem fit | GradeF Value14 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities GTX 1650 F 38 +308% capability · -53% price | |
| Light Use & EfficiencyEfficiency · lighter workloads | GradeA Value36 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities GTX 1650 B 100 +9% capability · -53% price | |
Balanced has no letter: it is a weighting preset, not a capability rubric. A grade answers “how well does this handle that job?” — price is never part of it. Relative Value puts the current market price back in.
Compare these grades with the full tier list
Browse shortlists for different uses
Trade-offs
Works well if
- Light Use & Efficiency is your main prioritygraded A for Light Use & Efficiency on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
- FSR 3.1 with frame generation matters to youtemporal upscaler + frame generation, not ML-based — derived from the rdna2 architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value with Balanced priorities specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value with Balanced priorities — the calculation only gets there near CAD 213, against a cheapest tracked CAD 450
- Not the pick if 1440p Gaming is your main useit grades only F there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 1080p is not actually your main job — Light Use & Efficiency isit grades D for 1080p, but A for Light Use & Efficiency
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 1080p is your main useit grades D there; RX 7600 grades B at CAD 463
- You want strong value for 1080p specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for 1080p — the calculation only gets there near CAD 204, against a cheapest tracked CAD 450
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 1440p is not actually your main job — Light Use & Efficiency isit grades F for 1440p, but A for Light Use & Efficiency
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 1440p is your main useit grades F there; RX 7600 grades C at CAD 463
- You want strong value for 1440p specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for 1440p — the calculation only gets there near CAD 204, against a cheapest tracked CAD 450
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 4K is not actually your main job — Light Use & Efficiency isit grades F for 4K, but A for Light Use & Efficiency
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 4K is your main useit grades F there; RX 7600 grades F at CAD 463
- You want strong value for 4K specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for 4K per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1080p is not actually your main job — Light Use & Efficiency isit grades F for Ray Tracing @ 1080p, but A for Light Use & Efficiency
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 1080p is your main useit grades F there; RX 7600 grades F at CAD 463
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 1080p specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for Ray Tracing @ 1080p per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- You are buying for Ray Tracing @ 1080p and want no asterisksthe rubric caps this grade: fps estimated (medium confidence), not measured
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1440p is not actually your main job — Light Use & Efficiency isit grades F for Ray Tracing @ 1440p, but A for Light Use & Efficiency
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 1440p is your main useit grades F there; RX 7600 grades F at CAD 463
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 1440p specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for Ray Tracing @ 1440p per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- You are buying for Ray Tracing @ 1440p and want no asterisksthe rubric caps this grade: fps estimated (medium confidence), not measured
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 4K is not actually your main job — Light Use & Efficiency isit grades F for Ray Tracing @ 4K, but A for Light Use & Efficiency
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 4K is your main useit grades F there; RX 7600 grades F at CAD 463
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 4K specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for Ray Tracing @ 4K per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- You are buying for Ray Tracing @ 4K and want no asterisksthe rubric caps this grade: fps estimated (medium confidence), not measured
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- AI is not actually your main job — Light Use & Efficiency isit grades F for AI, but A for Light Use & Efficiency
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if AI is your main useit grades F there; GTX 1650 grades F at CAD 210
- You want strong value for AI specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for AI per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelGTX 1650 holds Relative Value 38 against its 14 for AI, at CAD 210
Works well if
- Light Use is your main prioritygraded A for Light Use on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade for Light Use — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
- FSR 3.1 with frame generation matters to youtemporal upscaler + frame generation, not ML-based — derived from the rdna2 architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for Light Use specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for Light Use — the calculation only gets there near CAD 266, against a cheapest tracked CAD 450
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelGTX 1650 holds Relative Value 100 against its 36 for Light Use, at CAD 210
- Not the pick if 1440p Gaming is your main useit grades only F there
Every line states the fact it was derived from, for the scenario selected above. Thresholds are calculated points on our value curve — information about where the maths turns, not instructions about what to pay.
Similar options to the RX 6500 XT 4GB
Chosen for Balanced
Chosen for 1080p
Chosen for 1440p
Chosen for 4K
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1080p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1440p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 4K
Chosen for AI
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: CUDA — Many local-LLM and diffusion toolchains are CUDA-only. ROCm and Vulkan builds exist and work, but they are not drop-in — check your toolchain before treating a non-NVIDIA card as an equivalent swap.
Alternatives stay near this product’s price range. Step-up options may exceed the standard budget envelope when the capability gain is meaningful.
More head-to-head comparisons in this category
Upgrade planner
Judge the change in the active scenario, then make the cash gap explicit.
Using page scenarioWhat are you upgrading from? These are the axes we compare on, and where this product stands in the current market.
We rank upgrades by out-of-pocket cost — the new price minus what yours is worth — not by sticker price.
Only candidates that clear the configured meaningful-upgrade gate will be shown; roles are omitted rather than filled.
Capability differences are expressed as tiers and index points, not as benchmark percentages we did not measure.
Specifications and compatibility
What this product is, and what to check before it goes into your build.
Core / Performance
- Architecture
- RDNA 2.0
- GPU chip
- Navi 24
- GPU variant
- Navi 24 XT (215-135000006)
- Process node
- 6 nm
- Transistors
- 5,400 million
- Shading units
- 1024
Memory
- Capacity
- 4 GB
- Type
- GDDR6
- Bus width
- 64 bit
- Effective speed
- 18 Gbps
- Bandwidth
- 144 GB/s
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 107 W
- Power connector
- Varies by version
- Recommended PSU
- Varies by version
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x4
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Varies by version192–201 mm across tracked variants
- Height
- Varies by version107–128 mm across tracked variants
- Width
- Varies by version
- Slot thickness
- Varies by version2 across tracked variants
- Fans
- Varies by version2 across tracked variants
- Cooling
- Varies by version
- Outputs
- Varies by version
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 107 W
- Power connector
- 1x 6-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 300 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x4
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 201 mm
- Height
- 128 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 1× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- DUAL-RX6500XT-O4G
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 107 W
- Power connector
- 1x 6-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 300 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x4
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 192 mm
- Height
- 117 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 1× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-R65XTEAGLE-4GD
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 107 W
- Power connector
- 1x 6-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 300 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x4
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 194 mm
- Height
- 107 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 1× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- 11314-01-20G
- Vendor warranty
- 2 years
Select an exact version for physical dimensions and connector details.
Show all specifications
Core / Performance
- Texture units
- 64
- ROPs
- 32
- Ray tracing cores
- 16
- Tensor cores
- 0
- Base clock
- 2365 MHz
- Boost clock
- 2820 MHz
Features
- Upscaling
- FSR 3.1
- Frame generation
- frame generation
- Ray tracing
- Supported
- RGB lighting
- No
Warranty & release
- Release year
- 2022
Hover any value to see where it came from: a manufacturer specification, or a figure The Comparator calculated.
Sources: Comparator offer frame 2026-11-06–2026-11-09
What to check in your build
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Select a board to confirm its connector and cable-clearance needs.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Slot occupancy depends on the board cooler and thickness.
Select an exact version above for physical dimensions and connector details.
300 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 6-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 201 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
300 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 6-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 192 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
300 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 6-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 194 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
Compare all 3 board variants
| Variant | Length | Slot thickness | Power connector | Recommended PSU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS DUAL RX 6500 XT OC | 201 mm | 2 | 1x 6-pin | 300 W |
| GIGABYTE RX 6500 XT EAGLE | 192 mm | 2 | 1x 6-pin | 300 W |
| Sapphire PULSE RX 6500 XT | 194 mm | 2 | 1x 6-pin | 300 W |
Found an error? Report this specification Email the field, corrected value and an optional source.
Compatibility guidance is practical help, not a score. Missing data is shown as unknown, never invented.
Summary
RX 6500 XT 4GB offers a balanced view across an all-round mix of priorities. It ranks #40 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 200. GTX 1650 currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RX 6500 XT 4GB offers D-grade capability for 1080p. It ranks #40 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 200. The D grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 6500 XT 4GB offers F-grade capability for 1440p. It ranks #40 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 200. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 6500 XT 4GB offers F-grade capability for 4K. It ranks #40 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 200. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 6500 XT 4GB offers F-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1080p. It ranks #36 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 149. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 6500 XT 4GB offers F-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1440p. It ranks #36 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 149. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 6500 XT 4GB offers F-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 4K. It ranks #36 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 149. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 6500 XT 4GB offers F-grade capability for AI. It ranks #40 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ai compute index 49. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 6500 XT 4GB offers A-grade capability for Light Use. It ranks #4 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 200. The main limitation appears when 1440p Gaming becomes the priority, where it grades F.
FAQ
Do all RX 6500 XT 4GB boards have the same physical design?
No. Dimensions, slot thickness, cooling, power connectors and display outputs belong to the exact board. Use the Exact version selector before checking case or PSU fit.
How much case clearance should I allow for the RX 6500 XT 4GB?
Tracked boards range from 192 to 201 mm in length. Select the exact board, then also allow for front radiators or fans, card height, slot thickness and power-cable bend; length alone does not guarantee fit.
Why does Relative Value change when I choose another scenario?
Each scenario changes the weights applied to capability, price and the other published factors. The hardware facts stay fixed, but the value question changes, so its score and rank can change too.
Why can Amazon appear without a tracked price?
Amazon listing snapshots can participate in Value while fresh. We show Check on Amazon instead of its price; confirm the current price and availability at the store. When no current listing snapshot exists, Amazon is a search link only.
Useful links & sources
offer frame 2026-11-06–2026-11-09 · formula gpu-value-v6.1 · facts facts-2026-11-09 · Relative Value is an estimate from our current dataset, the selected weights and dated market prices — not an official product rating and not a price forecast. Target prices are calculation thresholds, not predictions. Methodology We are not a shop. Affiliate links may earn us a commission; they never change the calculations or the ranking.