RTX 4060 Ti 8GB
The current RTX 4060 Ti 8GB price from retailers, its key specifications, and how it performs for each job.
AD106 · GPU · RTX 40

Retailer photo of ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EVO OC 8GB. View this offer in Where to buy
Works well for: 1080p Gaming
Trade-offs: you want strong value with Balanced priorities specifically
- VRAM
- 8 GB
- Board power
- 160 W
- Interface
- PCIe 4.0 x8
Move a slider and the page re-scores this product against the same market frame.
What does it cost today, and is that a good price?
Market confidence: MediumAt CAD 1200 the RTX 4060 Ti 8GB is priced in line with its CAD 1200 representative market level. Only one retailer currently backs that price, so the level is a single data point rather than a market.
Limited market: only one retailer currently has a verified offer, so treat this price as a single data point.
Prices & availability
RTX 4060 Ti 8GB: current price and offers
Compare the offers we track for this model, across variants and retailers.
3 tracked offers · 1 retailers
| Variant | Store | Condition | Price (snapshot) | Value · Balanced | Checked | Offer link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS DUAL RTX 4060 Ti WHITE OC | Newegg | New | CAD 1,200 | 45 | 2026-11-05 | View offer → |
| ASUS DUAL RTX 4060 Ti V2 | Newegg | New | CAD 1,200 | 45 | 2026-11-03 | View offer → |
| ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EVO OC 8GB | Newegg | New | CAD 1,200 | 37 | 2026-11-08 | View offer → |
| RTX 4060 Ti 8GBMultiple variants available | Amazon Affiliate | Varies | Find on Amazon | Not tracked | No price snapshot | Find on Amazon → |
Prices are dated snapshots, not live quotes — confirm the final price at the store. New, refurbished and used offers are listed separately; used offers carry warranty and seller risk.
Performance and where it ranks
Two different questions, side by side. Performance compares what the hardware can do; Value compares what that capability costs at today’s price. A product can rank high on one and low on the other — that gap is the point.
Performance Balanced
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#28 of 41 graded graphics cards
- #25 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 36
- #26 AMDRX 7700 XT 35
- #27 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 34
- #28 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 33
- #29 NVIDIARTX 5060 31
- #30 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 28
- #31 AMDRX 6700 XT 28
Value Balanced
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#33 of 42 currently priced graphics cards
- #30 NVIDIARTX 4080 43
- #31 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 41
- #32 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 38
- #33 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 37
- #34 AMDRX 7900 XTX 34
- #35 AMDRX 6700 XT 30
- #36 NVIDIARTX 5090 25
Performance 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#28 of 41 graded graphics cards
- #25 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 36
- #26 AMDRX 7700 XT 35
- #27 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 34
- #28 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 33
- #29 NVIDIARTX 5060 31
- #30 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 28
- #31 AMDRX 6700 XT 28
Value 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#26 of 42 currently priced graphics cards
- #23 NVIDIARTX 5080 48
- #24 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 46
- #25 NVIDIARTX 4060 46
- #26 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 45
- #27 AMDRX 7700 XT 45
- #28 NVIDIARTX 4090 43
- #29 AMDRX 7900 XT 42
Performance 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#28 of 41 graded graphics cards
- #25 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 36
- #26 AMDRX 7700 XT 35
- #27 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 34
- #28 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 33
- #29 NVIDIARTX 5060 31
- #30 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 28
- #31 AMDRX 6700 XT 28
Value 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#34 of 42 currently priced graphics cards
- #31 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 41
- #32 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 36
- #33 AMDRX 7900 XTX 35
- #34 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 32
- #35 AMDRX 6700 XT 31
- #36 NVIDIARTX 5090 26
- #37 NVIDIARTX A2000 19
Performance 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#28 of 41 graded graphics cards
- #25 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 36
- #26 AMDRX 7700 XT 35
- #27 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 34
- #28 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 33
- #29 NVIDIARTX 5060 31
- #30 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 28
- #31 AMDRX 6700 XT 28
Value 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#35 of 42 currently priced graphics cards
- #32 AMDRX 6700 XT 39
- #33 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 38
- #34 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 38
- #35 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 32
- #36 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 31
- #37 NVIDIAGTX 1650 28
- #38 AMDRX 6600 XT 26
Value Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#38 of 42 currently priced graphics cards
- #35 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 21
- #36 AMDRX 6600 XT 21
- #37 NVIDIAGTX 1650 18
- #38 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 10
- #39 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 6
- #40 NVIDIARTX A2000 6
- #41 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 5
Value Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#38 of 42 currently priced graphics cards
- #35 AMDRX 6600 XT 20
- #36 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 20
- #37 NVIDIAGTX 1650 17
- #38 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 11
- #39 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 7
- #40 NVIDIARTX A2000 7
- #41 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 5
Value Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#38 of 42 currently priced graphics cards
- #35 AMDRX 6600 XT 22
- #36 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 15
- #37 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 13
- #38 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 12
- #39 NVIDIAGTX 1650 12
- #40 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 8
- #41 NVIDIARTX A2000 7
Performance AI
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#15 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #12 NVIDIARTX 5070 29
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4070 28
- #14 AMDRX 9070 XT 23
- #15 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 21
- #16 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 21
- #17 AMDRX 9070 17
- #18 AMDRX 9070 GRE 16
Value AI
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#20 of 42 currently priced graphics cards
- #17 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 54
- #18 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 51
- #19 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 50
- #20 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 49
- #21 NVIDIARTX 3090 48
- #22 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 48
- #23 NVIDIARTX 5060 46
Performance 3D Rendering
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#14 of 38 graded graphics cards
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4070 41
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 40
- #13 NVIDIARTX 3090 35
- #14 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 28
- #15 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 28
- #16 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 28
- #17 AMDRX 7900 XTX 27
Value 3D Rendering
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#22 of 42 currently priced graphics cards
- #19 NVIDIARTX 5060 47
- #20 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 46
- #21 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 45
- #22 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 45
- #23 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 44
- #24 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 44
- #25 NVIDIARTX 3090 44
Performance Light Use
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#11 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #8 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 83
- #9 NVIDIARTX 5060 82
- #10 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 80
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 78
- #12 AMDRX 6600 XT 78
- #13 AMDRX 7600 77
- #14 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 76
Value Light Use
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#20 of 42 currently priced graphics cards
- #17 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 11
- #18 NVIDIARTX 4070 10
- #19 NVIDIARTX 5070 9
- #20 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 9
- #21 AMDRX 9070 XT 9
- #22 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 8
- #23 AMDRX 7800 XT 8
These ladders follow the preset scenario shown above. Your own weights re-score this product, not the whole field.
What it is good for
| Scenario | this productCapability grade · Value at current price | Higher capability | Higher Value with current priorities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced (all-round)Weighted all-round view | GradeNo grade Value37 | Higher capability RX 9070 XT 87 +82% capability · -8% price | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 GRE 100 +32% capability · -38% price |
| 1080p GamingRaster performance · 1080p | GradeA Value45 | Higher capability RX 9070 XT S 86 +82% capability · -8% price | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 GRE S 100 +32% capability · -38% price |
| 1440p GamingRaster performance · 1440p | GradeB Value32 | Higher capability RX 9070 XT S 89 +82% capability · -8% price | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 GRE A 100 +32% capability · -38% price |
| 4K / VRRaster performance · 4K / VR | GradeD Value32 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT A 100 +82% capability · -8% price | |
| Ray Tracing @ 1080pRay tracing capability · 1080p | GradeF Value10 | — | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT A 100 capability · -8% price |
| Ray Tracing @ 1440pRay tracing capability · 1440p | GradeF Value11 | — | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT B 100 capability · -8% price |
| Ray Tracing @ 4KRay tracing capability · 4K | GradeF Value12 | — | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT C 88 capability · -8% price |
| AI / Local LLMAI compute · memory and ecosystem fit | GradeC Value49 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RTX 4070 Ti Super A 93 +100% capability · +7% price | |
| 3D Rendering3D rendering · creator workloads | GradeB Value45 | Higher capability RTX 4070 Ti A 75 +76% capability · +18% price | Higher Value with current priorities RTX 4070 Ti Super A 93 +64% capability · +7% price |
| Light Use & EfficiencyEfficiency · lighter workloads | GradeB Value9 | Higher capability RTX 3050 6GB S 49 +28% capability · -50% price | Higher Value with current priorities GTX 1650 B 100 +27% capability · -83% price |
Balanced has no letter: it is a weighting preset, not a capability rubric. A grade answers “how well does this handle that job?” — price is never part of it. Relative Value puts the current market price back in.
Compare these grades with the full tier list
Browse shortlists for different uses
Trade-offs
Works well if
- 1080p Gaming is your main prioritygraded A for 1080p Gaming on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
- DLSS 4.5 with frame generation matters to yousecond-generation transformer upscaler + frame generation — derived from the ada architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value with Balanced priorities specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value with Balanced priorities — the calculation only gets there near CAD 559, against a cheapest tracked CAD 1200
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 GRE holds Relative Value 100 against its 37 with Balanced priorities, at CAD 750
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) is your main useit grades only F there
Works well if
- 1080p is your main priority — A here means confident 90–120 fps at high settingsgraded A for 1080p on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade for 1080p — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
- DLSS 4.5 with frame generation matters to yousecond-generation transformer upscaler + frame generation — derived from the ada architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for 1080p specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for 1080p — the calculation only gets there near CAD 674, against a cheapest tracked CAD 1200
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 GRE holds Relative Value 100 against its 45 for 1080p, at CAD 750
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) is your main useit grades only F there
Works well if
- 1440p is your main priority — B here means solid 60 fps at high settingsgraded B for 1440p on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — 8 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 6 GB grades C for 1440p; this one has 8 GB and hits no memory cap
- DLSS 4.5 with frame generation matters to yousecond-generation transformer upscaler + frame generation — derived from the ada architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for 1440p specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for 1440p — the calculation only gets there near CAD 476, against a cheapest tracked CAD 1200
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 GRE holds Relative Value 100 against its 32 for 1440p, at CAD 750
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) is your main useit grades only F there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 4K is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades D for 4K, but A for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 4K is your main useit grades D there; RX 9070 XT grades A at CAD 1100
- You want strong value for 4K specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for 4K per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 100 against its 32 for 4K, at CAD 1100
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1080p is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades F for Ray Tracing @ 1080p, but A for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 1080p is your main useit grades F there; RX 9070 XT grades A at CAD 1100
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 1080p specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for Ray Tracing @ 1080p per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 100 against its 10 for Ray Tracing @ 1080p, at CAD 1100
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1440p is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades F for Ray Tracing @ 1440p, but A for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 1440p is your main useit grades F there; RX 9070 XT grades B at CAD 1100
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 1440p specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for Ray Tracing @ 1440p per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 100 against its 11 for Ray Tracing @ 1440p, at CAD 1100
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 4K is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades F for Ray Tracing @ 4K, but A for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 4K is your main useit grades F there; RX 9070 XT grades C at CAD 1100
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 4K specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for Ray Tracing @ 4K per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 88 against its 12 for Ray Tracing @ 4K, at CAD 1100
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- AI is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for AI, but A for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if AI is your main useit grades C there; RTX 4070 Ti Super grades A at CAD 1283
- You want strong value for AI specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for AI — the calculation only gets there near CAD 442, against a cheapest tracked CAD 1200
Works well if
- 3D Rendering is your main prioritygraded B for 3D Rendering on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — 8 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 6 GB grades C for 3D Rendering; this one has 8 GB and hits no memory cap
- DLSS 4.5 with frame generation matters to yousecond-generation transformer upscaler + frame generation — derived from the ada architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for 3D Rendering specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for 3D Rendering — the calculation only gets there near CAD 376, against a cheapest tracked CAD 1200
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) is your main useit grades only F there
Works well if
- Light Use is your main prioritygraded B for Light Use on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade for Light Use — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
- DLSS 4.5 with frame generation matters to yousecond-generation transformer upscaler + frame generation — derived from the ada architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for Light Use specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for Light Use per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelGTX 1650 holds Relative Value 100 against its 9 for Light Use, at CAD 210
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) is your main useit grades only F there
Every line states the fact it was derived from, for the scenario selected above. Thresholds are calculated points on our value curve — information about where the maths turns, not instructions about what to pay.
Similar options to the RTX 4060 Ti 8GB
Chosen for Balanced
Chosen for 1080p
Chosen for 1440p
Chosen for 4K
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1080p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1440p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 4K
Chosen for AI
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: CUDA — Many local-LLM and diffusion toolchains are CUDA-only. ROCm and Vulkan builds exist and work, but they are not drop-in — check your toolchain before treating a non-NVIDIA card as an equivalent swap.
Chosen for 3D Rendering
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: OptiX — Blender Cycles reaches its fastest path on NVIDIA OptiX. HIP (AMD) and oneAPI (Intel) render the same scenes, so this is a workflow question, not a capability wall — but render times and add-on support differ.
Chosen for Light Use
Alternatives stay near this product’s price range. Step-up options may exceed the standard budget envelope when the capability gain is meaningful.
More head-to-head comparisons in this category
Upgrade planner
Judge the change in the active scenario, then make the cash gap explicit.
Using page scenarioWhat are you upgrading from? These are the axes we compare on, and where this product stands in the current market.
We rank upgrades by out-of-pocket cost — the new price minus what yours is worth — not by sticker price.
Only candidates that clear the configured meaningful-upgrade gate will be shown; roles are omitted rather than filled.
Capability differences are expressed as tiers and index points, not as benchmark percentages we did not measure.
Specifications and compatibility
What this product is, and what to check before it goes into your build.
Memory
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 160 W
- Power connector
- Varies by version
- Recommended PSU
- Varies by version
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x8
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Varies by version202–227 mm across tracked variants
- Height
- Varies by version120–123 mm across tracked variants
- Width
- Varies by version
- Slot thickness
- Varies by version2 across tracked variants
- Fans
- Varies by version2 across tracked variants
- Cooling
- Varies by version
- Outputs
- Varies by version
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 160 W
- Power connector
- 1x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 450 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x8
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 202 mm
- Height
- 120 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- DUAL-RTX4060TI-8G-V2
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 160 W
- Power connector
- 1x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 450 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x8
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 227 mm
- Height
- 123 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- DUAL-RTX4060TI-O8G-WHITE
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 160 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 450 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x8
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Unknown
- Height
- Unknown
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- Unknown
- Fans
- Unknown
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- Unknown
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- DUAL-RTX4060TI-O8G-EVO
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Select an exact version for physical dimensions and connector details.
Show all specifications
Features
- Upscaling
- DLSS 4.5
- Frame generation
- frame generation
Warranty & release
- Release year
- 2023
Hover any value to see where it came from: a manufacturer specification, or a figure The Comparator calculated.
Sources: Comparator offer frame 2026-11-06–2026-11-09
What to check in your build
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Select a board to confirm its connector and cable-clearance needs.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Slot occupancy depends on the board cooler and thickness.
Select an exact version above for physical dimensions and connector details.
450 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 202 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
450 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 227 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
450 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Unknown
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Unknown
Compare all 3 board variants
| Variant | Length | Slot thickness | Power connector | Recommended PSU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS DUAL RTX 4060 Ti V2 | 202 mm | 2 | 1x 8-pin | 450 W |
| ASUS DUAL RTX 4060 Ti WHITE OC | 227 mm | 2 | 1x 8-pin | 450 W |
| ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EVO OC 8GB | Unknown | Unknown | 1x 16-pin | 450 W |
Found an error? Report this specification Email the field, corrected value and an optional source.
Compatibility guidance is practical help, not a score. Missing data is shown as unknown, never invented.
Summary
RTX 4060 Ti 8GB offers a balanced view across an all-round mix of priorities. It ranks #28 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 780. RX 9070 GRE currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RTX 4060 Ti 8GB offers A-grade capability for 1080p. It ranks #28 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 780. RX 9070 GRE currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RTX 4060 Ti 8GB offers B-grade capability for 1440p. It ranks #28 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 780. RX 9070 GRE currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RTX 4060 Ti 8GB offers D-grade capability for 4K. It ranks #28 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 780. The D grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RTX 4060 Ti 8GB offers F-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1080p. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RTX 4060 Ti 8GB offers F-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1440p. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RTX 4060 Ti 8GB offers F-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 4K. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RTX 4060 Ti 8GB offers C-grade capability for AI. It ranks #15 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ai compute index 757. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RTX 4060 Ti 8GB offers B-grade capability for 3D Rendering. It ranks #14 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 780. RTX 5060 Ti 8GB currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RTX 4060 Ti 8GB offers B-grade capability for Light Use. It ranks #11 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 780. RX 9060 XT 8GB currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
FAQ
Do all RTX 4060 Ti 8GB boards have the same physical design?
No. Dimensions, slot thickness, cooling, power connectors and display outputs belong to the exact board. Use the Exact version selector before checking case or PSU fit.
How much case clearance should I allow for the RTX 4060 Ti 8GB?
Tracked boards range from 202 to 227 mm in length. Select the exact board, then also allow for front radiators or fans, card height, slot thickness and power-cable bend; length alone does not guarantee fit.
Do all RTX 4060 Ti 8GB boards use the same power connector?
No. Tracked versions use 1x 8-pin or 1x 16-pin. The connector shown in Specifications & compatibility changes with the exact board selection.
Why does Relative Value change when I choose another scenario?
Each scenario changes the weights applied to capability, price and the other published factors. The hardware facts stay fixed, but the value question changes, so its score and rank can change too.
Useful links & sources
offer frame 2026-11-06–2026-11-09 · formula gpu-value-v6.1 · facts facts-2026-11-09 · Relative Value is an estimate from our current dataset, the selected weights and dated market prices — not an official product rating and not a price forecast. Target prices are calculation thresholds, not predictions. Methodology We are not a shop. Affiliate links may earn us a commission; they never change the calculations or the ranking.